《纽约时报》系列竞赛含金量高吗?一文讲清它的价值&难度与备赛策略

《纽约时报》学生写作系列竞赛(NYT Student Writing Contests)由《纽约时报》旗下教育平台 The Learning Network 主办,面向全球 13—19 岁中学生,全年滚动开设多个赛道。

它的含金量不能简单用“高”或“低”概括:权威性足够,申请认可度明确,但不同赛道难度差异很大;真正决定价值的是学生能否产出有个人视角、可被官方发表的作品。

一、《纽约时报》系列竞赛的含金量体现在哪里?

1.媒体背书强,申请认可度较高

《纽约时报》长期被视为全球最具公信力的严肃媒体之一,赛事评审团队常包含资深编辑、专栏作家和教育学者。

获奖或入围作品可写入 Common App 活动列表,能直观体现学生的英文写作能力、批判性思维和公共议题意识。2023 年哈佛新生数据显示,约 17% 的学生拥有 NYT 写作竞赛获奖经历。

2.优秀作品有机会在官方平台发表

获奖作品通常会刊登于 NYT Learning Network 官网,部分赛道还会公开署名展示。
需要客观说明的是,多数作品发表在 Learning Network,而非《纽约时报》纸质版或主站新闻区;但这仍属于具备第三方背书的公开发表记录,对申请履历有实际帮助。

3.赛道多元,适配不同学生

NYT 系列并非单一比赛,而是全年多个项目组合,包括:

夏季读写竞赛:每周回应《纽约时报》内容,文字或短视频均可;

公开信写作:围绕社会议题写 500 词以内呼吁信;

音频故事/播客:制作 5 分钟以内原创播客;

学生评论:评析书籍、电影、音乐、展览等文化作品;

个人叙事:用短篇幅讲述真实生活片段;

STEM 访谈视频、摄影叙事等新赛道。

这使得写作、摄影、音频、视频表达各有发挥空间。

4.门槛低,但不等于容易获奖

参赛年龄为 13—19 岁,全程免费,部分赛道支持多次投稿。
但热门赛道竞争非常激烈:个人叙事竞赛获奖率通常不足 1%,社论/公开信类获奖率也极低;夏季读写竞赛因每周评选、投稿机会多,相对更适合入门。

二、哪些学生更适合参加?

学生类型 推荐赛道 备赛重点
初次参加国际写作竞赛 夏季读写竞赛 练习观点表达、引用 NYT 原文
关注社会议题、逻辑强 公开信/社论写作 训练论证结构、事实支撑
擅长讲故事、情感细腻 个人叙事 聚焦真实细节,避免空泛抒情
喜欢电影、文学、艺术 学生评论 建立主题,写出“为什么值得看”
口语表达或音频制作能力强 音频故事/播客 选题、采访、脚本与叙事节奏
理工科背景 STEM 访谈视频 用通俗问题呈现科学思维

三、备赛建议:少而精,重过程,重真实

1.不要贪多,选 1—2 个赛道做深

NYT 系列全年项目很多,但申请更看重持续投入和作品质量。与其每个赛道都投一次,不如选择最能体现个人兴趣的赛道,反复打磨。

2.保留写作过程,形成“可追溯”的成长证据

部分 NYT 赛事已要求文字稿在 Google Docs 中完成,以便通过版本历史确认原创性;未来赛事也可能继续强化反 AI 和过程核查。
建议学生从构思、初稿、修改到终稿都保留记录。这些过程材料不仅能应对原创性审查,也能成为申请文书的重要素材。

3.从“模板表达”转向“真实问题”

NYT 评审更看重个人联结、批判性思考和清晰表达,而不是华丽辞藻或宏大空话。
好的作品往往来自一个具体观察:一次社区经历、一段家庭对话、一篇引发困惑的新闻、一个被忽视的日常问题。真实细节比套话更有说服力。

4.提前规划时间线

NYT 赛事全年分布,不同赛道窗口不同。例如公开信写作通常在春季开放,播客竞赛多在春末,夏季读写竞赛集中在 6—8 月。

建议提前 2—3 个月开始阅读 NYT 文章、积累选题、练习短篇幅写作,而不是临近截止才仓促完成。

NYT竞赛往年优秀作品扫码免费领取【可提供报名服务】

2026-2027赛季《纽约时报》系列竞赛四大转向解读!为什么组委会要这样改?

作为全球含金量最高、影响范围最广的青少年表达平台之一,《纽约时报》系列赛在过去15年里吸引了全球数十万中学生参与。但如果你仔细梳理今年的新日历,就会发现这绝不仅仅是一份简单的"时间表更新"。

从赛事精简、形式跨界,到对AI的全面禁令与创作过程的深度考核——这场竞赛正在向全球青少年抛出一个极具时代感的问题:在这个充满AI痕迹与套路化包装的时代,你该如何证明你是一个有思想、有温度、有真实洞察的"独立个体"?

一、《纽约时报》竞赛新赛季四大关键转向

转向一:AI禁令全面升级——守住真实思考的底线

官方明确提出"零容忍"原则:不仅是文章写作,包括视觉、音频、视频在内的所有环节,严禁使用ChatGPT、Claude、Midjourney等任何AI工具进行生成、润色或翻译。

对于习惯了用AI批改语法、找思路、甚至生成初稿的学生来说,这无疑是一次极高的警示。组委会的态度很明确:你的文字必须100%来自你自己,你的思考必须100%源于你的大脑。

转向二:创作轨迹正式计入评审——写作即思考

这是今年最核心的变化。评委不再仅仅看终稿有多么华丽,而是要看学生从初稿到终稿的演变轨迹。比赛甚至要求通过Google文档的版本历史来展示思维的推演与修改痕迹。

这意味着什么?

一次性写完、几乎不改的"完美初稿",反而会让评委质疑创作的真实性

草稿和终稿之间的差距越大,越能证明你的投入、挣扎和成长

代笔和过度模板包装将无所遁形——版本历史会暴露一切

这实际上是在回归一个本质问题:文字与思想是如何诞生的?

转向三:从纯文本走向"多媒介表达"——新增两大跨界赛

今年首次推出的两项新比赛,打破了传统英文写作的边界:

新赛事 形式 考察核心
2026青少年成长视觉艺术赛 摄影、视觉设计 用视觉语言讲述成长故事
STEM访谈信息视频赛 视频、采访、图表 用综合媒介解释科学原理或社会议题

它不再只看词汇量或语法,而是考查学生能否用摄影、视频、采访、图表等综合媒介,去讲述科学原理或探讨这一代人的困境。这是对"表达能力"的重新定义——会写很重要,但会"说"、会"拍"、会"问"同样重要。

转向四:夏季读写赛精简至3轮——逼迫"精准发力"

维度 往年 2026-2027赛季
投稿轮次 横跨暑假的10轮 6月、7月、8月各1轮,共3轮
策略逻辑 "海投"碰运气 精细打磨,精准发力
选题要求 广泛尝试 深度聚焦

投稿机会的减少,意味着学生不能再靠"数量"取胜,必须在选题和视角上进行更精细的打磨。每一轮投稿都是一次"只有一次机会"的决战。

二、为什么组委会要这样改?理解背后的深层逻辑

对于中国留学家庭而言,理解这些规则变化背后的深层逻辑,远比盲目参赛更重要。

1.避免同质化的文书泛滥

过去几年,不少国际生的申请材料和竞赛作品陷入了同质化泥潭:套用模板、辞藻堆砌、甚至由机构高度精修。当AI工具普及后,生成一篇格式规范、文采斐然的文章变得极其容易。

组委会意识到,如果只看最终成品,评判的可能不是孩子的思想,而是背后的技术或外援。《纽约时报》希望通过版本历史和多媒介表达,迫使学生剥离包装,展现真实的自我。

2.顶尖大学招生的风向标

美本顶尖名校近年来越来越看重学生的"真实性"与"跨学科思考力"。无论是写一封面向社会的公开信,还是制作一段科普访谈视频,这些项目考查的其实就是未来的学术基本功:

如何发现真实世界的问题?

如何找到合适的受访者或事实依据?

如何把复杂的逻辑清晰表达出来?

NYT竞赛的规则调整,与顶尖大学的招生趋势高度同频。参加这项比赛,本质上是在提前演练大学和未来社会需要的核心能力。

三、给中国参赛者的三条实战建议

第一,从"写得好"转向"想得深"。

AI可以帮你写得漂亮,但AI无法替代你的思考。评委现在看的是思考的过程,而不仅是思考的结果。养成"先写再改"的习惯,保留每一版草稿,让版本历史成为你真实思考的见证。

第二,拥抱多媒介,不要只做"写字的人"。

如果你会摄影、会剪辑、会设计图表,新的跨界赛事为你打开了额外的机会窗口。这些技能不是"加分项",而是新的竞争力维度。

第三,少而精,不要贪多。

夏季读写赛从10轮减到3轮,是在告诉你:质量远胜于数量。把80%的精力投入到1个精心打磨的作品上,比分散投10个粗糙作品更有效。

NYT竞赛往年优秀作品扫码免费领取【可提供报名服务】

《纽约时报》系列竞赛为什么它成了留学申请的"隐形王牌"?2026-2027赛季两大新规必须重视!

在留学申请竞争日益激烈的今天,学生们手握的竞赛证书越来越多,但真正能让招生官眼前一亮的却寥寥无几。《纽约时报》系列竞赛(NYT Contests)凭借独特的媒体基因和创新的评审机制,正成为越来越多初高中生的优先选择。它的含金量究竟有多高?值不值得投入时间?本文从四个维度为你拆解。

一、《纽约时报》系列竞赛为什么它成了留学申请的"隐形王牌"?

维度一:权威背书,国际认可度拉满

《纽约时报》创立于1851年,是全球最具影响力的十大报纸之一,在新闻报道领域享有"有记录的报纸"之美誉。依托这份百年大报的品牌影响力,NYT系列竞赛自带极强的国际公信力。

与一些区域性或小众学科竞赛不同,《纽约时报》的品牌认知度覆盖全球。北美顶尖院校的招生官对这份报纸再熟悉不过——他们每天阅读它、引用它、尊重它。当你的申请材料中出现"NYT竞赛获奖者"时,招生官的解读是直观的:

这位学生具备扎实的英文写作功底

能够进行独立思辨和深度表达

拥有全球化视野和跨文化沟通能力

这些正是北美顶尖院校高度认可的学术软实力。在标化成绩日益趋同的申请池中,NYT竞赛经历是一块极具辨识度的"金字招牌"。

维度二:成果落地,拥有官方发表机会

NYT竞赛的价值不止于一张证书。

优秀获奖作品有机会登上《纽约时报》官方平台——The Learning Network——公开刊载。更有极少数作品会被选中,发表在《纽约时报》的印刷版上。

这意味着什么?你的文字,可能出现在与普利策奖获奖文章同一家报纸的版面上。对于青少年创作者而言,这是极具分量的官方成果,其背书价值远超普通竞赛的"参与证明"或"获奖证书"。

在留学申请中,"作品被《纽约时报》发表"与"获得某不知名竞赛三等奖",两者的分量完全不在一个量级。前者是可验证、可查询、可追溯的硬核成就。

维度三:深耕能力,适配名校招生标准

NYT竞赛的备赛过程,本身就是一次全方位的能力锻造:

备赛环节 培养的能力 名校招生标准对应
自主选题 独立思考、兴趣探索 Intellectual Curiosity
调研梳理 信息筛选、批判性思维 Critical Thinking
构思创作 逻辑表达、创意输出 Communication Skills
反复打磨 专注力、执行力、成长型思维 Resilience & Growth

从选题到成稿,学生需要独立完成一个完整的创作闭环。这种经历与大学阶段的独立研究项目(Independent Research)高度相似,是名校招生官在文书中最想看到的"故事素材"。

维度四:低门槛高回报,参赛性价比极高

与传统学术竞赛相比,NYT系列竞赛有一个显著优势:无专业背景限制。

对比维度 传统学术竞赛(如AMC、BPhO) NYT系列竞赛
专业门槛 需要系统学科知识储备 13岁及以上即可参与
时间投入 长期集训,数月甚至数年 短篇赛事仅需数小时至数天
参赛次数 每年固定1-2次 支持多次投稿参赛
成果形式 分数/排名 可发表的作品

以100词个人叙事写作比赛为例:学生只需撰写一篇精简优质的短文即可参赛,耗时少、投入低,但潜在回报极高。对于课业繁重的初高中生来说,这是适配性最强的国际竞赛选择之一。

二、两大新规:2026-2027赛季必须重视

本赛季,NYT竞赛推出了两项重大规则调整,直接影响备赛策略:

新规一:评审纳入完整创作过程

评委不再只看最终成品。评委会通过"版本历史记录"查看从初稿到终稿的修改过程。

这意味着什么?

草稿和终稿之间的差距越大,越能证明你的投入和成长

一次性写完、几乎不改的"完美初稿",反而可能让评委质疑创作的真实性

保留修改痕迹、展示思考演变,成为新的得分策略

备赛建议:养成"先写再改"的习惯,保留每一版草稿。在提交时,确保版本历史能清晰展示你的迭代过程——从粗糙到精致,从模糊到清晰。

新规二:AI工具全面禁止

本赛季对生成式AI实行最严格禁令,涵盖以下所有场景:

禁止行为 具体说明
AI生成草稿 不可用AI生成初稿后自己修改
AI润色修改 不可用AI修改或润色自己写的草稿
AI生成内容片段 不可用AI生成任何短语、句子、段落
AI生成多媒体 不可用AI生成声音、图像或视频片段
AI翻译 不可用AI将作品从一种语言翻译成另一种语言

核心原则:你的作品必须100%由你本人创作,AI不能参与任何环节。

备赛建议:从选题到成稿,全程手写或手动打字。如果习惯用翻译工具辅助,现在必须切换到纯英文思维创作。评委对AI生成文本的识别能力正在提升,一旦被发现,取消资格是大概率事件。

三、适合谁参加?9-10年级学生的黄金机会

一般建议9-10年级的学生优先考虑NYT系列竞赛:

9年级:积累写作经验,熟悉国际竞赛节奏,为后续更长篇的论文比赛打基础

10年级:提前为11年级申请季的文书素材做准备,一个好的个人叙事可以同时服务于竞赛和申请

对于目标北美顶尖院校的学生来说,NYT竞赛是"性价比最高"的背景提升路径之一:投入时间可控、成果可发表、能力锻炼全面、招生官认可度高。

NYT竞赛往年优秀作品扫码免费领取【可提供报名服务】

夏季阅读比赛第 10 周获胜者:On Happiness, Politics, Language and the Universe

我们的第十七届年度暑期阅读竞赛已经结束。在过去的十周里,我们邀请世界各地的青少年告诉我们哪些《纽约时报》的文章、散文、视频、播客、图表、照片等内容吸引了他们的注意力,并用短文或视频解释原因。

我们总共收到了 10,642 份参赛作品,本周,我们将公布最后一批决赛入围者名单,其中包括四位最高获奖者:Chloe Sohn凭借她的视频获奖,Alex Krystelle Boral、Dohyoung Kim和Valerie Herman凭借他们的文章获奖。

Our Winners

Alex Krystelle Boral, 16, from San Marcos, Calif., responded to the Opinion essay “To Find Happiness, I Stopped Talking. It Helped.”:

Though my perspective has changed, I know I would’ve felt personally attacked if I read the article “To Find Happiness, I Stopped Talking. It Helped.” a year ago.

TMI wasn’t a thing in my world. My friends had the privilege of hearing every detail about my life, whether it be my crushes or my test scores. Other times, it was a dance rehearsal or a slip-up in my French class.

While this habit has passed with time, Fishman’s words got me thinking about where it came from. His article had an answer: the noise of social media and daily life.

As a high schooler, I’ve fallen into a college admissions rabbit hole, meaning I constantly see posts and fear mongering centered on college applications. This began to perpetuate a fear that controlled every move: the fear of falling behind.

To combat this fear, I explained everything. It was my attempt at defending my honor — my attempt to prove that I wasn’t behind, but doing something right. Even when I messed up.

Like Fishman, I found solace in the outdoors. Long walks and hikes became a source of calm, even when the trails were anything but. The noise of the world faded, leaving the sound of rocky footsteps and ducks on a lake.

I learned the most about myself in the one place where it didn’t matter. The trees didn’t ask for my GPA. The rocks didn’t care about my activities list.

I learned that letting the silence of nature talk did more for me than any post or sign of approval did. Even if my younger self would beg to differ.

Chloe Sohn, 15, from Englewood Cliffs, N.J., commented on the U.K. politics article “How Nigel Farage Ended Up Running Against a Man Dressed as a Trash Can” in a video:

视频链接:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWP8QN6W2ho

Dohyoung Kim, 16, from Potomac, Md., reacted to the Times Magazine piece “Saying ‘Google It’ Makes You Sound Old. Search It Up!”:

I barely knew any English eight years ago.

Before immigrating to the United States, I took beginner classes in South Korea, where I learned phrases like “Hi” and “Good, and you?” However, a couple of days later, I stepped into my classroom, where students greeted me with “wassup”s and “yo”s. The truth is, though, the English I had learned wasn’t wrong — it simply belonged to earlier generations.

Eight years later, I thought I had finally caught up. I’m now a fluent English-speaking teenager, so I was surprised when the article “Saying ‘Google It’ Makes You Sound Old. Search It Up!” talked about how saying “Google it,” a phrase I thought was completely normal, is becoming outdated among younger people due to the development of A.I. models, and “search it up” is the more current phrase. In fact, an 11-year-old interviewed for the article had never even heard any of her friends say “I Googled it” before.

What surprised me wasn’t just that the phrase had changed, but that I hadn’t even noticed. I thought that if I learned enough vocabulary and grammar, I would eventually catch up. But this article made me realize that there is no finish line. New expressions appear, old ones become outdated, and each generation reshapes the language little by little.

Eight years ago, I was afraid I wouldn’t catch up to English. Now, I realize that no one ever does. Perhaps being fluent isn’t knowing every phrase people use, but rather being comfortable adjusting as the language changes around me.

And Valerie Herman, 17, from Cherry Hill, N.J., wrote a moving reflection on “Another Giant Leap Reminds Us How Small We Are”:

It’s just the three of us, in an old car, in an empty parking lot, heads sticking out the windows and necks craned back to look at the never-ending sky.

“Do you guys think the universe is too big or too small?” I ask.

“Too big,” they say back to me in unison.

Ruth Graham’s article “Another Giant Leap Reminds Us How Small We Are” echoes that sentiment.

Artemis II isn’t in the sky tonight. We’re just teenagers talking about college and our secret dreams and the fact that Earth is “merely one small sphere in an endless expanse.”

When I look up at the sky, though, I think we’ve made the universe too small.

We’re all thinking our big thoughts in our tiny bodies, and we’re so grand for that: our dreams and emotions, water in overflowing cups.

Then, all too few of us get to taste it. Space travel “is still out of reach for all but government-sponsored astronauts and the wealthiest space tourists.”

Scratch space travel — we’ll never even see all of Earth. Rich or poor, the world is only as vast as time allows it to be.

We’re talking about college, hoping for enough financial aid and merit to make it work. Space? First, let us make it out of our home states.

Our enormous universe, constantly shrinking to fit within our arm’s reach.

“Let’s hang out again next week.”

Just the three of us, in our tiny lives. Us, in an old car, in an empty parking lot, sharing the stars between us three and everyone else looking.

“Yeah.”

Runners-Up

Ahalya Sahai Mittal on “All This Staring at Our Faces Is Messing With Our Heads”

Angie Yang on “How We Speak Has Gotten Extravagant. Literally.”

Darby Yang on “Sun’s Out, Umbrellas Out”

Ella Armstrong on “Look Up at the Sky. The Perseid Meteor Shower Will Awe You.”

Emerald Valentine on “Trump Administration Is Repurposing Federal Land for A.I. Data Centers”

Hanie Shan on “How Does One Brain Speak Two Languages?”

Ian Kim on “When His Church Goes Dark, They Talk to His Digital Twin”

Megha Mishra on “I’m Begging You: Never Write With A.I.”

Mia Chang on “Stop Location-Tracking Your Friends and Lovers”

Nora Lan on “BTS, K-Pop Giants, to Boycott the Grammys”

Om Vegesna on “Ariana Grande and the Debate Over Health, Privacy and Celebrity”

Sara Ansari on “‘Spider-Man’ Opens to $932 Million Worldwide, Defying Superhero Slump”

Honorable Mentions

Amber Xu on “Aiming for My Fastest Marathon, I Turned to Distance Running’s Mecca”

Annais Sohn on “How to Stop Procrastinating”

Anya Bollineni on “Listening to New York City”

Chloe Cairns on “The Little Rituals That Prepare You for Sleep”

Chloe Cheng on “Touching Grass”

Elaine Wang on “My Son Was Killed by ICE. I Want Accountability.”

Elizabeth Lu on “Lawyer Arguing at Supreme Court to Save Birthright Citizenship Is a Birthright Citizen”

Gavin Reddy on “Lake Mead, the Nation’s Largest Reservoir, Is Smaller Than Ever”

Guancheng Wang on “A Ton of Space Junk Tumbles Unpredictably to Earth Every Week”

Jiayi Wu on “Your Cat Is Being Nice? Think Again.”

Jiyul Lee on “How We Speak Has Gotten Extravagant. Literally.”

Kate Moretski on “The U.S. Relies on Family Caregivers. Millions of Them Are Kids”

Katherine Xie on “To Find Happiness, I Stopped Talking. It Helped.”

Kerem Carikcilar on “The Gospel According to Anthony Bourdain”

Keya Dedasaniya on “The Best Ice Cream Shops in New York City Right Now”

Luke A. Schioppo on “13-Year-Olds Have Problems at Work, Too”

Makayla Niu on “You Paid to Have Old Clothes Recycled. Here’s What That Really Means.”

Matthew Smith on “Aryna Sabalenka Undone by the Wind at French Open Again as Diana Shnaider Seizes Her Moment”

Nevaeh Tejani on “An Invasive Mosquito Is Spreading With Alarming Speed, Threatening Africa’s Cities”

Sarah Hartey on “I’m Begging You: Never Write With A.I.”

Sophie Liu on “The Best Ice Cream Shops in New York City Right Now”

Syndia Jin on “What Does Summer Taste Like?”

Vidya Hariani on “Is This What a Post-Literate Era Looks Like?”

William Beebe on “Gen Z-ers Dress Like They’ve Never Worn Clothes Before”

纽约时报100词个人叙事写作比赛已开启!2026比赛信息介绍!有何参赛价值?

创立于1851年的《纽约时报》,是全球最具影响力的十大报纸之一,在新闻报道领域一直被业内视为"有记录的报纸",享有极高的公信力与美誉度。

依托这份百年大报的权威背书,《纽约时报》每年面向全球初高中生举办一系列写作比赛,以激发创造力、促进自我表达。其中,100词个人叙事写作比赛(100-Word Personal Narrative Contest)凭借篇幅短小、贴近生活、参与门槛低等优势,深受全球青少年青睐。2021年,该赛事吸引了超过11,000人参赛,最终选出8名获胜者、16名亚军、24名荣誉奖和154篇优秀作品。

一、比赛渊源:从《纽约时报杂志》的生活专栏走来

如果你翻阅《纽约时报》的各个版面,会发现个人叙事无处不在,这类文章经常跻身每周最受欢迎文章之列。

这项比赛的灵感直接来源于《纽约时报杂志》的生活专栏。该专栏始于1996年,以"关于有意义的人生经历的简短而有力的故事"为特色。2019年,这项从生活专栏延伸而来的比赛正式诞生,如今已走过数届,持续以简短有力的个人故事闪耀光芒。

《纽约时报》多年来设有专门的个人叙事专栏,主题涵盖爱情、家庭生活、校园生活、残疾人生活、人与动物的关系、克服焦虑等方方面面。个人叙事写作比赛正是邀请学生撰写关于有意义生活经历的记叙文——乘着《纽约时报》的东风,这项赛事每年备受瞩目。

二、比赛内容:100词之内,讲好一个故事

今年的比赛规则相当开放:除了100词的字数限制外,不设定特定主题、结构或风格要求。

参赛学生只需叙述一个现实生活中特定经历的简短、有力、真实的故事。但请注意,文章中需要展现出冲突、角色、背景、对话、声音和戏剧性弧线等故事元素。100词的限制意味着每一个字都必须承担叙事功能——没有冗余的铺垫,没有多余的修饰,只有最精炼的表达。

三、为什么值得参加?三大核心价值

1.写作能力的全面锻造

100词的极致限制,能有效锻炼学生的多项能力:细致敏锐的观察能力、精巧布局的架构能力、生动细腻的表达能力、洞悉本质的思维能力。它迫使你在极短篇幅内完成起承转合,这种"戴着镣铐跳舞"的训练,对记叙文写作水平的提升是跨越式的。

2.文书素材的提前储备

个人叙事比赛的竞赛要求与大学申请文书有很多相似之处。一个好的个人叙述不只是讲故事,更要融入自己的思考与意义探索,带给读者无限回味的空间,用真诚打动读者——这正是大学招生官希望在众多文书中看到的亮点。参加这场比赛,等于写作竞赛和文书素材积累两手抓。

3.简历上的亮眼背书

参赛经验本身就是简历中的加分项。如果有幸获奖,获奖作品将发表在The Learning Network上,并有机会被选登在《纽约时报》印刷版。这对任何一位申请者来说,都是极具分量的学术荣誉。

四、适合谁参加?9-10年级学生的黄金机会

一般建议9-10年级的同学考虑参加。一方面,可以通过这项比赛积累写作经验,为日后参加其他长篇论文比赛奠定基础;另一方面,能够提前为11年级申请季的文书素材做好准备。

2026年比赛详细信息

项目 具体内容
比赛时间 2026年9月16日至10月28日
作品形式 100词以内的文章(不包括标题)
作品要求 叙述一个简短、有力、真实的故事,讲述自己生活中一次有意义的经历;必须为原创,未在其他地方发表
提交限制 每位学生只能提交一份参赛作品
参赛对象 世界各地13至19岁的初中或高中学生
特殊说明 大学生不可参赛;正在修读大学课程的高中生可以参赛;魁北克省两年制CEGEP一年级学生可以参赛;19岁及以下已完成高中教育但未入读大学的学生可以参赛
排除对象 《纽约时报》员工的子女和继子女,以及与这些员工同住的学生
参赛方式 太平洋时间2026年10月28日晚上11:59前,使用官方竞赛表格提交
评奖方式 《纽约时报》记者及美国各地学习网络工作人员和教育工作者评审;比赛结束后约两个月公布获奖名单
作品发表 获奖作品发表在The Learning Network,有资格被选登《纽约时报》印刷版

重要提醒:所有参赛者必须获得家长或监护人的许可才能参加。参赛作品必须面向英语受众。

NYT竞赛往年优秀作品扫码免费领取【可提供报名服务】

夏季阅读比赛第 9 周获胜者:On Dementia, Fauci and Fashion Slop

本周是为期十周的挑战赛的第九周,我们收到了1230份投稿,并从中选出了两段视频和一篇短文作为获奖作品。它们分别来自Lilian Fu、Jun X. Ren和Ava Castillo。你可以在下方欣赏他们的作品。

Our Winners

First, Lilian Fu, 14, from Fort Lee, N.J., reacts to the episode of The Daily podcast “Why Do Some Memories Survive Dementia?”:

视频链接:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4IsREAtD6E

Next, Jun X. Ren, 16, from New York City, shares his thoughts on the July 29 article “Fauci Invokes Fifth Amendment More Than 100 Times in Bitter Senate Hearing”:

The recent Fauci hearing brought back painful memories for countless Americans, including myself. I don’t remember exactly how many times I contracted Covid-19, but I do remember the scars it left on me, my family, and my community.

The article “Fauci Invokes Fifth Amendment More Than 100 Times in Bitter Senate Hearing” covers the ways Republicans drilled Fauci in a Senate hearing and the ways Democrats pushed back against Chairman Rand Paul. But beneath dramatic moments like the ousting of Fauci’s lawyer and his refusals to answer basic questions designed to humiliate him lies the quiet, unaddressed suffering of millions of families.

As residents of a majority Asian American neighborhood, my family felt the fear of racially motivated attacks hanging in the air throughout the pandemic. Stronger than our fear, however, was our anger at the way our highest leaders encouraged the blaming of specific groups over medical advice that could save lives.

While politicians bicker away in marble buildings, trained on scoring points for party agendas and news highlights, millions of Americans have to face their reopened wounds. The public is reminded that those in charge failed to protect them during a crisis, and still fail to offer conclusions today.

The day our scars can finally begin to heal will be the day that our leaders decide to put a national tragedy above a performance for the cameras. Until then, all that plagues the nation will be polarization and uncertainty.

Finally, Ava Castillo, 15, from Whittier, Calif., responds to the Opinion essay, “The Rise of Fashion Slop”:

视频链接:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-30FSCv6nzw

Runners-Up

Akshara Dalan on “Police in India Use Tear Gas and Batons on Crowds Protesting Exam Scandal”

Anna Kwak on “Working Parents Say They’re in a Losing Battle Over Their Time”

Ayat Nayyer on “Nobel-Winning U.S. Chemist Will Move to China to Lead A.I. Institute”

Charvi Deorah on “Help! I Might Be a Tradwife”

Chelsea Park on “Do You Really Need Closure?”

Jasmine Wang on “Help! I Might Be a Tradwife”

Jiyul Lee on “What Does Summer Taste Like?”

Junhao Liang on “These Teeny Tiny Spiders Are Social Media Stars”

Roy Hyun on “The Lo-Fi Way I Broke My Addiction to the Algorithm”

Sam Jindal on “Would Your Life Make a Good Documentary?”

Tina Tan on “What Does It Means to Be Touch-Starved?”

Vivian Chen on “Why Are These Toys So Hard to Get a Hold Of?”

Honorable Mentions

Aaron Sheng on “Just Let Your Kids Watch TV Already”

Alesia Pantu on “When Did Bare Nails Become a Status Symbol?”

Angela Xie on “7 Gardens So Serene, You Won’t Believe They’re in the City”

Brandon Li Wang on “If You’re Over 40, You’re Ready to Use A.I.”

Caleb Klassen on “‘Spider-Man: Brand New Day’ Review: Can We Do Whatever a Spider Can?”

Chloe Cairns on “Would Your Life Make a Good Documentary?”

Claire Liang on “‘The Odyssey’ Gives Us the Hero We Deserve”

Esther Chung on “Life Is Better With Siblings”

Julia Jang on “Ariana Grande and the Debate Over Health, Privacy and Celebrity”

Nishka Vikram on “Why Do Some Memories Survive Dementia?”

Richard Qi on “Reliving Their Gym Class Nightmares, One Sprint at a Time”

Seaver Chen on “Would Your Life Make a Good Documentary?”

Sung Hee Shin on “Help! I Might Be a Tradwife”

Yayun Tan on “How to Keep a Travel Journal”

Zeqi An on “Could U.S. Water Systems Be a New Front in the Iran War?”

夏季阅读比赛第 8 周获胜者:On Wordle, Data Centers and Gen Z ‘Cockroaches’

本周是为期十周的挑战赛的第八周,我们收到了1190份投稿,并选出了 三位获奖者,分别是 Sam Jindal、Foss Goodwin 和 Christopher Leung 的文章。 你可以在下方欣赏他们的作品。

Our Winners

First, Sam Jindal, 18, from Orange County, Calif. takes us through his attempt to solve the infamous July 15 edition of Wordle:

视频链接:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10540v3dEdo&t=11s

Next, Foss Goodwin, 18, from Utah, investigates a claim covered in “How Utahns Took on Mr. Wonderful and a Data Center on the Great Salt Lake”:

视频链接:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAVCcO0NamM

Finally, Jozef Jemy, 15, an Indian student who currently lives in Dubai, shares his thoughts on “India’s Young Protesters Take Aim at Modi With Creative Signs”:

视频链接:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQnd8cX6VhE

Runners-Up

Alexander Goodspeed on “Meet Jimothy, the ‘Silly and Round’ Creature Taking Over Instagram Feeds”

Caitlyn Shi on “To Confront My Fear of Heights, I Crossed a Chasm on a Cable”

Elena Gil on “Should We Make Daylight Saving Time Permanent?”

Hahjin Kim on “What Does Happiness Look Like, 250 Years In?”

Hansol Jung on “My Parents Suspect I’ve Lost My Faith. Should I Tell Them the Truth?”

Kim Le on “The Choice Facing Some Immigrants: Pay $1.8 Million in Fines or Leave”

Kristen Cheung on “Gen Z Fell Out of Love With Work. I Don’t Blame Them”

Momoka Matsumoto on “They Want to Be Fathers, One Braid at a Time”

Nusaiba Nursi on “Is This What a Post-Literate Era Looks Like?”

Raina Park on “Does Matt Damon Look Greek? No. So Stop Complaining About Lupita Nyong’o.”

Renesh Balaji on “Police in India Use Tear Gas and Batons on Crowds Protesting Exam Scandal”

Sophie Yeh on “Japan is Startled by Prime Minister’s Grueling Sleep Schedule”

Sulin Jung on “What AI Kant Do”

Honorable Mentions

Apollo Chen on “A Tribute to the Mathematically Marvelous Soccer Ball"

Brian Kim on “Stop Worrying, and Let A.I. Help Save Your Life”

Daphne Canaran on “What You Miss When You’re Always Wearing Headphones”

Eva Sajnani on “Tate Brothers Arrested in Miami as U.K. Authorities File New Rape and Trafficking Charges.”

Frank Xu on “In Defense of Dumb Dogs”

Gavin Liu on “Meet Jimothy, the ‘Silly and Round’ Creature Taking Over Instagram Feeds”

Jacqueline Lee on “How Does One Brain Speak Two Languages?”

Karina Yeung on “The Gift of Getting Weirder With Age”

Lalita Ambati on “What Does Summer Taste Like?”

May Miyazaki on “Hitler’s birthplace in Austria becomes a Police Station”

Miaoyi Peng on “Government Overhauls Teen Pregnancy Program to Focus on Marriage and Starting Families”

Naz Ozok on “Turkey or Türkiye? Who Is the U.S. Playing?”

Sophia Lee on “Is It OK to Alter Photos of Yourself to Look Better Online?”,

Sumaita Nur on “Angella Ferguson, a Leader in Sickle Cell Anemia Research, Dies at 100”

Victor Ding on “How ‘Sentinel Gardens’ Help Spot Dangerous Bugs Abroad”

Youxi Han on “Why Young People in China Are Buying Feelings"

夏季阅读比赛第 7 周获胜者:On ICE and a T. Rex Fossil

本周是为期十周的挑战赛的第七周,我们收到了1244份投稿,并选出了 两位获奖者,分别是 Griffin Gallo 和 Cristina Ramirez 的文章。 你可以在下方欣赏他们的作品。

Our Winners

视频链接:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIW1nAvPg3Y&t=32s

Griffin Gallo, 17, from New York City reacts to “T. Rex Fossil Sells for $50.1 Million, Putting the King Back On Top” in the video above.

Cristina Ramirez, 16, from Laredo, Texas, writes about “For 35 Years, Undocumented, and Chasing the American Dream.” Here is her essay:

Two brown skinned, baseball cap clad, Texan fathers of three drove to work on the morning of July 7. One of them never came home, and the other is my father. As I read “For 35 Years, Undocumented, and Chasing the American Dream” I couldn’t help but feel shaken because of the resemblances between the late Lorenzo Salgado Araujo and my dad.

One notable difference is that my dad is a U.S. Citizen and Mr. Salgado was not. However, the writer mentions that during the fatal encounter, he wasn’t the target of the operation, so the question of his legal status was not present. This detail, and the ever increasing death toll at the hands of ICE, amplified my fear that deadly encounters could befall any Mexican-American.

In the land of the free, no community should fear being unjustly targeted by a government agency. In both Mr. Salgado’s community and my own, 1 in 4 residents are foreign born. It is undeniable that we find strength in our diversity and rely heavily on undocumented labor forces.

As stories like these become more prevalent, my fear that my family could become targets for a federal law enforcement agency increases. My frustration grows with every passing death as I bear witness to the inaction by the federal government to regulate ICE.

Ronaldo, Mr. Salgado’s eldest son watched his father bleed out through the pixels on his screen. Tomorrow afternoon, when my father returns from work, I will feel blessed that he got home safely, but angry that I had to be concerned.

Runners-Up

Helen Dai on “Why Young People in China Are Buying Feelings”

Isaac Yeung on “An Elite N.Y.C. Public School Admitted 777 Students. Only 3 Were Black.”

Jiamu Wei on “What to Know About the Supreme Court’s Birthright Citizenship Order”

Justin Wang on “ChatGPT Led to a Man’s Near-Fatal Health Crisis, Lawsuit Claims”

Karl Eikermann on “Kids Can’t Stop Watching ‘Moana.’ There’s a Scientific Explanation.”

Lindsey Kim on “Madonna Has Become an Avatar for Our Fear of Aging”

Nandita Dani on “Why We Delude Ourselves About the Birthrate"

Nigel Li on “Could A.I. Do Your Job? We Put Agents to the Test.”

Honorable Mentions

Angie Yang on “Cyclospora Cases Are Rising. Here’s What to Know.”

Ian Kim on “What if the Wood Used to Make Musical Instruments Becomes Illegal?”

Izzy Teng on Can I Wear Big Jewels With My Jeans and T-Shirt?

Melody Mo on “At Least 23 People Have Been Shot at by Federal Immigration Since Last Year”

Shuwei Jiang on “The Comforting Resurgence of ‘Grandma Hobbies’"

Sissi Zhu on “Laufey: Living With Dissonance”

Siwon Lee on “There’s an Ancient Solution to Our Modern Crisis of Attention"

Winston Choy on “How to Hand-Wash Dishes Better”

Yumin Kim on “Kids Can’t Stop Watching ‘Moana.’ There’s a Scientific Explanation.”

2026-2027《纽约时报》系列写作竞赛时间轴发布!两大新规严格限制AI!

《纽约时报》系列学生写作竞赛被誉为全球中学生的“写作奥林匹克”,旨在鼓励全球13-19岁的中学生洞察世界、独立思考并清晰表达观点。2026-2027赛季共涵盖七项核心赛事,覆盖写作、音频、视频、视觉艺术等多种形式。

一、 2026-2027赛季《纽约时报》系列写作竞赛时间轴

学生可根据自身特长,在赛季内参加任意数量的比赛,但每项比赛仅限提交一份作品:

My Tiny Memoir(百字回忆录):

赛事日期:2026.09.16 - 10.28

本比赛灵感来自纽约时报Modern Love专栏著名的Tiny Love Stories(微爱情故事)。

要求用仅100个英文单词讲述个人生活中的重要经历。

What It’s Like to Grow Up in 2026

成长于2026视觉艺术赛:

赛事日期:2026.10.28 - 12.09

现在做一名青少年是什么样的体验?
你们这一代人面临哪些独特的挑战?
2026年的世界为年轻人提供了哪些特殊的机遇?

今年,纽约时报长期举办的 Coming of Age(成长)系列比赛首次仅接受视觉艺术作品。

作品形式不限,包括:摄影,绘画,油画,漫画,图表,数据可视化,截图,短片,雕塑或几乎任何能够拍照上传的视觉作品。

提交作品时,还需附上一份艺术家说明,记录你的创作过程,并阐述作品如何与上述三个核心问题相关联。

The STEM Interview

STEM访谈视频赛:

赛事日期:2027.01.06 - 02.17

制作2分钟以内的原创视频,采访相关领域专家以解答科学、技术或工程问题1。

Open Letters

公开信观点写作赛:

赛事日期:2027.02.17 - 03.31

撰写不超过500词的抗议信或呼吁信,写给能够推动社会改变的人或组织。

Audio Stories

音频故事播客赛:

赛事日期:2027.03.31 - 05.12

制作一段5分钟以内的原创播客,主题与形式不限。

Voice and Choice: Summer Reading

夏季阅读赛:

2027年6月至8月(共三轮)

重大赛制调整:2027年该赛事缩减为仅在6月、7月和8月各举办一轮(共3轮),而非以往的10轮。每月需提交短文或90秒视频回应“本周《纽约时报》哪篇内容最吸引你”。

Current Events Conversation

每周时事讨论:

全学年持续开放。学生可每周针对每日写作话题发表观点,优秀作品将被专栏展示。

二、 2026-2027赛季纽约时报写作竞赛“反AI”硬核新规

在生成式AI泛滥的时代,纽约时报今年对AI使用政策进行了极其严格的升级,违规作品将被直接取消评审资格:

全面封杀生成式AI:严禁使用任何AI工具(如ChatGPT、MidJourney等)生成、修改、润色或翻译作品。无论是文字、图片、音频还是视频,均不得包含AI生成或增强的内容。

创作过程纳入正式评分:评委不仅看最终作品,还会评估学生的创作记录与反思。例如,书面作品必须在Google Docs中从头至尾完成并分享,以便评委通过“版本历史记录”查看从初稿到终稿的修改过程。

三、 参赛资格与评审机制

参赛门槛:面向全球13-19岁的初高中生(以提交作品当天年龄为准)。作品必须为全英文原创,未在任何公开平台发表过。

匿名评审:所有比赛均由《纽约时报》编辑、记者及教育工作者进行匿名评审,评委无法看到学生或学校信息,确保绝对公平。

结果公布:通常在每项比赛结束后的2-3个月公布,获奖作品将发表于《纽约时报》Learning Network页面,且作者保留作品版权。

NYT竞赛往年优秀作品扫码免费领取【可提供报名服务】

2026年纽约时报夏季阅读比赛获胜者

每年夏天,在为期 10 周的时间里,世界各地的青少年都会受邀回答以下问题:“本周《纽约时报》的什么内容最让您感兴趣?” 以下是最受官方喜欢的答案:

夏季阅读比赛第 10 周获胜者:On Happiness, Politics, Language and the Universe

夏季阅读比赛第 9 周获胜者:On Dementia, Fauci and Fashion Slop

夏季阅读比赛第 8 周获胜者:On Wordle, Data Centers and Gen Z ‘Cockroaches’

夏季阅读比赛第 7 周获胜者:On ICE and a T. Rex Fossil

夏季阅读比赛第 6 周获胜者:On National Parks and Brainrot

夏季阅读比赛第 5 周获胜者:On Cats, Dystopian Novels and Sleep

夏季阅读比赛第 4 周获胜者:On Literacy Struggles and Sleeping Fish

夏季阅读比赛第 3 周获胜者:On Gen Z Movies and Walking to the World CupSpaceX and the World Cup

夏季阅读比赛第 2 周获胜者:SpaceX and the World Cup

夏季阅读比赛第 1 周获胜者:The Knicks, Memes, Family Secrets and Clavicular

在线客服
微信咨询