夏季阅读比赛第 9 周获胜者:‘A Battleground in an Intergenerational Conflict’

Winner

Vanessa Chen, 16, from Vancouver on “A Sock War Is Afoot Between Millennials and Gen Z”

Runners-Up

In alphabetical order by the writer’s first name.

Emeline Zhou on “Are We Happy Yet?”

Filiz Fish on “What Trump Means When He Mispronounces ‘Kamala’”

Jessica Wu on “When Did Everything Become a ‘Journey’?”

Smrithe Rajesh on “Why Does My Teenager Insist on Wearing Used Clothes?”

Honorable Mentions

Andy on “Test Your Focus: Can You Spend 10 Minutes With One Painting?”

Angela Shi on “People Say Queer People Are Born That Way. It’s More Complicated.”

Cecile Chen on “You Won’t See Them at the Olympics, but These Speed Puzzlers Are World-Class”

Dalida Milly Janevathanavitya on “Have We Reached Peak Baby Name?”

Daniel Liu on “The Tiny Chinese Restaurant That Became an Olympic Hot Spot”

Jiayi Li on ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Review: Nothing Ever Ends

Lillian Zhang on “Why Does My Teenager Insist on Wearing Used Clothes?”

Maggie Qin on “What Is Ballet in the 21st Century? It’s All Over the Place.”

Mayaas A. on “Is Decaffeinated Coffee Bad for You?”

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛第 9 周更多获奖论文+导师亮点评析

重要提醒!纽约时报夏季读写比赛迎来最后一周!

欢迎来到纽约时报夏季读写比赛的第十周!本周比赛已经开始,这也是这个夏季读写比赛的最后一周。准备参加本周比赛的同学们请注意,提交文章的截止时间为东部时间8月16日上午9点。

通过前几周的比赛,相信大家对纽约时报夏季读写比赛已经有了更深入的了解。作为一项门槛低、含金量高的写作比赛,每周都会开启新一轮的文章投递通道。如果你之前没有参加过这项竞赛,或者对竞赛还不了解,那么一定要好好阅读这篇文章!

纽约时报夏季读写比赛规则详解

参赛对象

全球范围内的初中和高中学生,年龄在13-19岁之间。

参赛形式

个人参赛,每位参赛者每周只能提交一次作品。

作品提交时间

提交窗口期为2024年6月7日至8月16日,每周截止时间为下周五东部时间上午9点。

作品要求

参赛者需从《纽约时报》2024年发布的任意一篇文章、评论、视频、图表、照片或播客中挑选一个主题,撰写一篇不超过1500个字符(约250-300词)的文章,表达个人观点或反思。

获奖机制

每周二,官方会在专门的帖子中公布前一周的优胜者名单。

获奖率低于3%,竞争相当激烈。

比赛规则细节

书面答复准则

您的书面回复应告诉我们您在《纽约时报》上阅读、观看或收听的内容,以及它引起您注意的原因。您可以在本专栏中找到许多示例,重点介绍我们以前的获奖者的工作。

以下是一些需要牢记的准则:

书面答复不得超过 1,500 个字符,或约 250 个单词

确保包含您选择的《纽约时报》文章的完整 URL 或标题。例如,“照顾章鱼特伦斯的乐趣和挑战”或 https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/11/us/tiktok-octopus-pet-oklahoma.html。是的,这包含在字数中。

视频回复指南

与书面回复一样,视频回复应该解释您选择了《纽约时报》的哪篇文章以及您选择它的原因。本指南中的建议虽然最初是根据书面回复创建的,但也适用于视频。

比赛意义

通过阅读《纽约时报》的多元内容,参赛者可以拓展视野,增进对世界的理解。

写作过程锻炼了批判性思维和表达能力,有助于提升个人的沟通技巧。

获奖不仅是一种荣誉,也是对个人写作能力和视角独到性的认可,对未来的学术和职业发展有积极影响。

最后,祝愿所有参赛者在最后一周的比赛中取得出色的成绩!📝🏆✨

扫码下载夏季阅读比赛获奖论文+导师亮点评析+备赛书单⇓

2024-2025年度纽约时报三项全新赛事盘点!

《纽约时报》是美国最大的本地都市报之一,也是美国三大报纸之一。纽约时报系列竞赛由《纽约时报》全年滚动举办。主办方一直致力于帮助青少年参与世界上正在发生的事情,并告诉青少年他们的声音和想法很重要。对于想要申请人文社科专业的学生来说,纽约时报写作竞赛绝对是一个绝佳的选择,纽约时报每年都会更新整个年度的写作赛事,你一定能找到适合自己的竞赛。

纽约时报2024-2025年竞赛日历已更新,共推出了10项竞赛,包括三个全新的赛事:

Election 2024 Student Conversation Forum

Coming of Age in 2024: A Multimedia Contest

My List: A Different Kind of Review Contest

比赛一:Election 2024 Student Conversation Forum

与2020年文明对话挑战赛类似,是一种便捷的论坛讨论形式,帮助美国乃至全世界13岁以上青少年就重要问题进行丰富讨论。

比赛时间:2024年9月至10月

参赛对象

美国和英国的任何青少年(13 岁及以上)以及世界其他地区任何 16 岁及以上的青少年均可加入讨论。

问题与开放评论:

Forum 1 | Identity: Who are you, and how does that identity inform your political beliefs and values?(9月10日开放)

Forum 2 | Conversations Across Divides: What experiences have you had in talking to those who may not agree with you — whether in school, with friends and family, or online? What has been helpful? What has been hard? Why do these conversations matter?(9月12日开放)

Forum 3 | The Issues: What issues matter to you most? How do they connect to your life and the lives of those you care about?(9月17日开放)

Forum 4 | Information and Disinformation: Where do you get your information about current events? How do you think these sources affect your understanding of our world?(9月19日开放)

Forum 5 | Hope for the Future: What are you optimistic about? What might your generation do better than those that came before it? (9月24日开放)

比赛二:Coming of Age in 2024: A Multimedia Contest

比赛要求:选择我们在 2024 年选举学生对话论坛中提出的任何问题,并做出回应——无论是写作、视觉艺术、视频还是音频。

比赛时间:2024年10月2日—11月4日

参赛对象

全球范围内13-19岁的中学生

参赛形式:文字、照片、音频、视频

(更多比赛规则和细节将在之后更新)

比赛三:My List: A Different Kind of Review Contest

比赛要求:选择三到五件艺术品或文化作品以某种方式分组,然后用600字或更少的字告诉我们为什么我们应该或不应该查看它们。

参赛对象

全球范围内13-19岁的中学生

比赛时间:2025年1月15日至2月12日

NYT竞赛往年优秀作品扫码免费领取【可提供报名服务】

夏季阅读比赛第 8 周获胜者:‘The More You Know About Something the Less Scary It Is’

Winner

Hayne Kim, 16, from Tokyo, reacts to a Guest Essay from the Opinion section, “My Sister Was Murdered 30 Years Ago. True Crime Repackages Our Pain as Entertainment.” She writes:

My descent into the true crime rabbit hole was thanks to YouTuber Stephanie Soo. On far too many lazy Sunday afternoons than I would like to admit, I sat slouched in front of my laptop with my eyes fixed on the flashy fluorescent screen, an unhealthily huge bowl of Takis at hand. Video after video, I clung on to Stephanie’s every last syllable as she fed me one tragic tale after another through spoonfuls of uncanny suspense.

I continued to devour Stephanie’s stories just as quickly as I licked the MSG off my sticky red fingers.

Until I read this article.

At the ripe age of six, Annie Nichol lost her older sister Polly at the hands of a murderer.

Subsequent to Polly’s murder, Annie was continually met with floods of faceless reporters, writers, producers — strangers — all with an unquenchable thirst for details and an eager desire to dramatize. This constant bombardment of the gates that protected her private, sacred memories of her sister caused Annie immense pain and post-traumatic stress.

Suddenly, the hefty plates of Stephanie Soo videos I had wolfed down churned uneasily in my stomach.

I realized just how desensitized I had become. A human being’s lived-in nightmare is not meant to be hastily packaged into a sixty-something-minute monetized video. The inability of myself and countless others to immediately recognize this serves as a testament to the unsettling effects of mass media consumption.

Runners-Up

In alphabetical order by the writer’s first name.

Anagha Nagesh on What Trump Means When He Mispronounces ‘Kamala’

Desi Miller on “104 Shows. $260 Million. After 10 Years, Billy Joel Closes a Chapter.”

Gabriel Lam on “Giant Pandas Will Head to D.C.’s National Zoo From China”

Minghao Li on “If You Know What ‘Brainrot’ Means, You Might Already Have It.”

Vivian Wan on “The Book Bag That Binds Japanese Society"

Honorable Mentions

Yue Li on “Kids? A Growing Number of Americans Say, ‘No, Thanks.’”

Kareena Gunawardana on “The Tradwife Life Is Nothing New"

Amelia Yuan on “Cats Are Better Than Dogs”

Audrey Wang on “It’s Hot Out. People Still Look Good.”

Charles Peterson on “JD Vance, an Unlikely Friendship and Why It Ended”

Claire Weng on “My Father’s Quiet Love Speaks Louder Than Words”

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛第 8 周更多获奖论文+导师亮点评析

夏季阅读比赛第 7 周获胜者:‘The More You Know About Something the Less Scary It Is’

Winner

Michelle Zhibing Zhou, 15, from Hong Kong, read the Science article, “Videos Show That Leeches Can Jump in Pursuit of Blood.” Here is her response:

Leeches! Bleh! Famed for their role in medieval medicine, they’re often dismissed as repulsive, blood-thirsty parasites. So, imagine my surprise and morbid curiosity when I stumbled upon an article that added insight into their world and abated some of my irrational fears.

Surprisingly, leeches reminded me of something very different: myself. When I have a craving, like for chocolate, I scurry to the store. Similarly, when motivated by their craving for blood, leeches are “provoked [into] acts of startling athleticism,” springing through the air, then splatting on the ground comically. Adding even more intrigue, the video included ground-breaking footage ending the age-old debate about whether leech-leaping was even possible. The finding sent ripples throughout the leech research community and shivers down my spine.

As with many things in life, the more you know about something the less scary it is. The article helped dissipate some of my fear and disgust, presenting leeches as being motivated by food (like me!), and with amusing behaviors. The article changed my perception of leeches from nightmare fuel to riveting little creatures.

Don’t get me wrong though, while leeches are endlessly captivating, being that, to them, I’m a tasty walking bag of blood, I don’t want them snacking on me in a tropical forest. I’ll stick to watching them from afar, behind a screen, and preferably while nibbling on a bar of chocolate.

Runners-Up

In alphabetical order by the writer’s first name.

Nazira Musabaeva on “After 12 Years of Reviewing Restaurants, I’m Leaving the Table”

Noa Riss on “‘Crown Jewels of the Jewish People’: Preserving Memories of the Holocaust”

Shi Yi Yang on “A Family Dinner with My Wife and Girlfriend”

Sissi Ma on “When It Comes to Food and Politics, Kamala Harris Is Riffing on the Recipe”

Honorable Mentions

Alex Ding on “The Youngest Pandemic Children Are Now in School, and Struggling”

Angirmaa Shinebaatar on “Cows Are the New Puppies”

Blanche Li on “The Most Important Writing Exercise I’ve Ever Assigned”

Erin Yoon on “The Jewelry Shiona Turini Never Takes Off”

Joshua Zhuang on “I Was Settling Into My Morning Commute on the 4 Train”

Lindsey Huang on “What Your Grocery Cart Says About You”

Sarah Guo on “Defeated by A.I., a Legend in the Board Game Go Warns: Get Ready for What’s Next”

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛第 7 周更多获奖论文+导师亮点评析

夏季阅读比赛第 6 周获胜者:‘Is Friendship Becoming Obsolete?’

Winner

Alex Cox, 16, from Bethesda, Md., responded to an article headlined “For Older People Who Are Lonely, Is the Solution a Robot Friend?” She wrote:

Is friendship becoming obsolete?

That’s what I wondered as I read this article, a sick feeling swelling in my gut. Many older people depend on ElliQ’s synthetic friendship. But I share Professor Porteny’s concern that these people can’t “enjoy the beautiful reciprocity that emerges from social interactions.” ElliQ provides something that almost mimics genuine human companionship, but is “almost” enough? If so, what’s the cost of trading real friendship for the artificial variety, especially for people nearing the end of their lives?

I spent last week with my grandfather, who’s almost 96. We had countless conversations over meals whose recipes my grandmother left us about everything from his former job as a NASA engineer to the German dialect he brought across the ocean fleeing World War II. That week, we did more than talk: we connected; we learned from each other; we united generations; we bridged worlds. The most fundamentally human action, after all, is to share.

What if instead of me, he’d spent the week with a robot? Something that could compute but not learn, hear but not listen, respond but not reciprocate? What if he’d died with nobody to share his rich, beautiful story?

Elderly people deserve companions. But they also deserve to have their recipes remembered, their dialects learned, and their stories told after their deaths. They deserve a human. As much as ElliQ can do, it will never be able to be one.

Runners-Up

In alphabetical order by the writer’s first name.

Anthony Babu on “Wildlife Protections Take a Back Seat to SpaceX’s Ambitions”

Cailyn Liu on “Welcome to Stucktopia”

Celina Chen on “What Your Grocery Cart Says About You”

Haiyang Zeng on “I’m a Psychiatrist. Here’s How I Talk to Transgender Youth and Their Families About Gender Identity.”

Joedie Sta. Cruz on “I’m a Psychiatrist. Here’s How I Talk to Transgender Youth and Their Families About Gender Identity.”

Honorable Mentions

Alex Xu on “Elon Musk’s Plan to Put a Million Earthlings on Mars in 20 Years”

Charlotte on “For Biden, a Race Against Time”

Chloe Jiang on “A Feline Scientist Explains Why Your Cat Might Actually Like You”

Ella Gentile on “Shelley Duvall, Star of ‘The Shining’ and ‘Nashville,’ Dies at 75”

Gabbi on “What We Know About the Assassination Attempt Against Trump”

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛第六周更多获奖论文+导师亮点评析

夏季阅读比赛第 5 周获胜者:‘A Voice Can Change You’

Winner

来自加拿大安大略省的14岁女孩安妮·马马(Annie Ma)回应了歌手德萨(Dessa)在《纽约时报》杂志上的文章 “Who Am I Without My Voice?”

Runners-Up

Qiaorui Zhang on “What Does Anxiety Look Like? How Pixar Created the ‘Inside Out 2’ Villain”

Emma Reznik on “Defeated by A.I., a Legend in the Board Game Go Warns: Get Ready for What’s Next”

Henry Hudson on “Covid Cases Are Rising Again. Here’s What to Know.”

Jianxi Wu on “Is Xenophobia on Chinese Social Media Teaching Real-World Hate?”

Madison Perreault on “Pattern of Brain Damage is Pervasive in Navy SEALs Who Died by Suicide”

Phineas Collins on “Justices Give Trump Substantial Immunity”

Sophie Lee on “My Son Was in a Pyschiatric Hospital. Why Was I Celebrating?”

Vivian W. Chang on “Along the Hollywood Walk of Fame, a Struggle to Make a Living"

Honorable Mentions

Ethan Wu on “Our Pandemic Puppy Brought Pure Joy. Losing Him, Pure Heartbreak."

Anne on “I Saw My Anxiety Reflected in ‘Inside Out 2.’ It Floored Me.”

Christina Htay on “The Angst and the Joy of Celebrating Pride Month in a Small Town”

Lara on “Are We in the Middle of a Spiritual Awakening?"

Lena Singh on “Stampede at Religious Gathering in India Kills More Than 100”

Samira Kennerly on “When Your Identical Twin Wins a Grammy”

Zihao Ye on “Can I Use A.I. to Grade My Students’ Papers?”

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛第五周更多获奖论文+导师亮点评析

2024年纽约时报夏季阅读比赛获胜者

每年夏天,在为期 10 周的时间里,世界各地的青少年都会受邀回答以下问题:“本周《纽约时报》的什么内容最让您感兴趣?” 以下是最受官方喜欢的答案:

夏季阅读比赛第 9 周获胜者:‘On Stonehenge and Mispronouncing ‘Kamala’’

夏季阅读比赛第 9 周获胜者:‘A Battleground in an Intergenerational Conflict’

夏季阅读比赛第 8 周获胜者:‘The More You Know About Something the Less Scary It Is’

夏季阅读比赛第 7 周获胜者:‘The More You Know About Something the Less Scary It Is’

夏季阅读比赛第 6 周获胜者:‘Is Friendship Becoming Obsolete?’

夏季阅读比赛第 5 周获胜者:‘A Voice Can Change You’

夏季阅读比赛第 4 周获胜者:‘As a Muslim, Those Words Pierce My Soul’

夏季阅读比赛第 3 周获胜者:‘First Someone Dies, Then Everyone Expects Us to Eat’

夏季阅读比赛第 2 周获胜者:‘Mom, I’m Sorry’

夏季阅读比赛第 1 周获胜者:‘Costco, Don’t Give Up on America as a Nation of Readers’

每周都能冲奖!纽约时报夏季读写竞赛获奖文章都有什么特点?

作为一个门槛低、含金量高的写作比赛,每周都为参与者提供了锻炼写作技能和挑战自我的绝佳机会。获奖者们往往成为藤校、JHU、UCB等Top30名校的香饽饽,因此参加比赛对未来的留学申请将是一大助力!你的暑假计划准备好了吗?New York Times夏季读写比赛正在等你的参与!

1.适合学生 

全球范围内13-19岁且尚未开始本科学习学生

*注:《纽约时报》员工的子女和继子女不得参加。与时报员工住在同一家庭的青少年同理不得参加。

2.竞赛时间

2024年6月7日-8月16日

每周一次,每人每周仅可提交一份作品,参赛学生可连续每周投稿。

3.竞赛内容 

自2024年6月7日开始,每周五,官方网都会发布一个帖子并提出同样的问题:

What got your attention in The Times this week?

本周《纽约时报》上的哪些内容引起了你的关注?

学生可以自行选择纽约时报上2024年发布的任意主题下的任意一个articles, Op-Eds, videos, graphics, photos and podcasts发表自己的看法,在下周五的上午9点前(美东时间),围绕问题提交自己的回答。

2024年8月9日,官方将发布夏季读写竞赛的最后一个帖子,并开放至8月16日上午9点(美东时间)。

从2024年6月25日开始,每周二,官方将公布上一周的获胜者。

4.参赛规则 

提交不得超过1500字符,即 250~300单词。

务必提供所选《纽约时报》内容的完整链接或完整标题(注意本词条包含在字数限制内)

赛事期间的每周或任何一周均可参加,但每周只能提交一次。

作品提交截止时间为每周五上午 9 点(美东时间),逾期不予接受。

完成提交后,可以选择生成你作品提交后的链接,以便参赛者证明自己参赛。

不得抄袭、借鉴,不得由他人创建或使用AI生成。

保证原创性,不得使用已发布作品(包括校刊、其他竞赛以及其他任何地方。)

作品仅限个人提交,不支持2人或多人组队。

5.评审标准

6.奖项设置

获奖的优秀作品将有机会在《纽约时报》的官网刊登。

虽然在比赛期间每周都可以提交作品,但获奖率却极低。去年主办方总共收到近9500份参赛作品,却只有270件作品获奖。这也是该竞赛备受美国大学的认可的重要原因!

纽约时报夏季读写竞赛获奖文章都有什么特点?

1.与个人经历共鸣:

   - 将个人经历与文章内容相结合,展现个人独特的思考和感悟。

   - 通过讲述与文章相关的小故事,体现个人情感与文章主题的共鸣。

2.读前读后的变化:

   - 明确阐述读文章前后自己的态度或想法的变化。

   - 突出文章中的信息或观点如何影响了作者的思考方式和行为方法。

3.关联时效性与社会热点:

   - 选择具有时效性和社会影响力的主题,增加文章的吸引力。

   - 结合个人经历,为官方报道提供不同的视角或补充。

4.产生小众角度:  

   - 从独特的、少有人涉足的视角切入,展现文章的个性和创新性。

   - 避免陈词滥调,力求以新颖的角度和观点吸引评委的注意。

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛更多获奖论文+导师亮点评析+备赛书单

纽约时报夏季读写拿奖容易吗?NYT夏季读写竞赛参赛&获奖情况分析!

纽约时报夏季读写比赛由全球十大新闻媒体之一的《纽约时报》(New York Times)主办,面向全球中学生,每年夏季举办,持续10周,吸引了全球超过8万名中学生的参与。趁着这个夏天,与纽约时报展开一场奇妙机遇!

纽约时报夏季读写比赛获奖情况

1.参赛人数与获奖概率:

近年来,纽约时报夏季读写比赛的参赛人数总体呈增加趋势,2023年总计有10144人参赛。

2022年总计有11545人参赛。

2021年总计有9500人参赛。

根据每周参赛人数的变化显示,不难发现第一周参赛人数最少。从第六周开始,每周的参赛人数都会在1000人左右,并逐渐增加。最后,第十周(也就是最后一周)的参赛人数最多。可能是因为比赛接近尾声,许多人希望抓住最后的机会参与其中,争取获得好成绩或者奖项。

因此,早期参赛相对竞争较小,获奖概率可能更高。

2.总获奖率趋势:

每周平均总获奖率如下:

2023年平均总获奖率为1.72%。

2022年平均总获奖率为1.97%。

2021年平均总获奖率为3.08%。

近三年的总获奖率逐年下降,从2021年的3.08%降至2023年的1.72%。这反映了比赛难度的增加和竞争的激烈程度。

在比赛的不同阶段,总获奖率呈现不同的变化。特别是第一周的总获奖率相对较高,越往后,总获奖率会越低。这样的趋势在三年的比赛中反复出现,因此,建议大家还是尽早参赛可能增加获奖的机会。

获奖策略建议

考虑到早期参赛的竞争相对较小以及总获奖率较高的特点,建议有意参加比赛的选手尽早报名并投稿

除了关注获奖率外,选手还应注重提升作品的质量和独特性,以更大概率脱颖而出。这包括与个人经历结合、展现读前读后的变化、关联时效性与社会热点以及产生小众角度等方面。

虽然纽约时报夏季读写比赛的竞争日益激烈,但通过了解参赛人数与获奖概率的关系以及总获奖率的变化趋势,并采取相应的策略,选手仍有机会在比赛中脱颖而出并获得奖项。

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛更多获奖论文+导师亮点评析+备赛书单