夏季阅读比赛第 3 周获胜者:‘He Replied With a Single Thumbs-Up’: The Week 3 Winner of Our Summer Reading Contest

Winners

Ellena Li, 15, from Toronto, responded to a June article from the Well section, “The Subtle Art of the Dad Text,” by writing:

Asian parents don’t text their kids like they do in Western movies. There are no “I love you”s, no heart emojis, no long paragraphs about how proud they are. My dad texts, “Spinach feta wrap. Want?” That’s his version of I love you. His language isn’t flowery or loud; it’s quiet, practical, and wrapped in a Starbucks order. Most often, it’s communicated through Messenger: a single thumbs-up emoji. Whenever I got a good grade, I’d send him a screenshot.

He’d reply with 👍.

If I got an A+, he might even send three 👍👍👍.

That was his version of fireworks.

At first, I found it funny, like we were playing a secret code game only we understood. Somehow, no matter what I sent him, that little thumbs-up felt like a whole conversation. It meant I’m proud of you, I see you, you’re doing great.

Then one day, I got a bad grade. I sent it anyway, nervous but honest. I waited, expecting silence or maybe a short voice message asking what happened.

Instead, he replied with a single thumbs-up.

Just one.

It was the same emoji as before, but this time, it hit differently. It felt heavier, quieter, more human. And I cried. Because in that moment, I understood: That emoji didn’t mean good job. It meant I’m still here. It meant I love you, even now. A true father’s love doesn’t always sound like words — it shows up in the silence, in the small things, in a world where a thumbs-up can mean


Runners-Up

Amaira Rathor on ‘‘Human Therapists Prepare for Battle Against A.I. Pretenders"

Angie Y. on “The Joy of Swimming With Strangers"

Bailey C. on “What My Dad Gave Me”

Bhavya Thakur on “Immigration Raids Add to Absence Crisis for Schools”

Elaine Zhang on “Does It Matter How a Cello Is Held? It’s a Centuries-Old Debate.”

Emma B. on “Chin Hair, Laundry, Your Opinion: Women in Menopause Don’t Care”

Hanyi Zhou on ”Shoes On or Shoes Off?”

Henry Hudson on “Who Wants a BlackBerry? Apparently, Gen Z.”

Lalie Lours on “I Teach Memoir Writing. Don’t Outsource Your Life Story to A.I.”

Melody Z. on “3 Lessons for Living Well, From the Dying”

Sragvi B. on “First Time in 100 Years: Young Kayakers on a Ride for the Ages”

________

Honorable Mentions

Aisha A. on “Slow and Steady, This Poem Will Win Your Heart”

Andy Q. on “Real Risk to Youth Mental Health Is ‘Addictive Use,’ Not Screen Time Alone, Study Finds”

Chloe Ning on “Can This Not-Particularly-Cute Elf Make China Cool?”

Colbie S. on “The Morning Ritual That Helps Me Resist the Algorithm”

Deena A. on “Snow White and the Seven Kajillion Controversies”

Delancey Z. on “I Brake for Robins”

Ella G. on “‘Floating Ballerina Vibes’: The Hypnotic Allure of Indoor Skydiving”

Ginkgo C. on “Why Is Everybody ‘Crashing Out’?”

Isabel S. on “Vera Rubin Scientists Reveal Telescope’s First Images”

Ishani on “Do You See Craters or Bumps on the Moon’s Surface?"

Jeff (Seunghyun) Cho on “I, Human”

Jenna R. on “What My Dad Gave Me"

Jessica G. on “How L.A. Raids Ignited a New Fight Over Immigration”

Katelyn T. on “Immigration Raids Add to Absence Crisis for Schools”

Lawrence Z. on “A G.O.P. Plan to Sell Public Land Is Back. This Time, It’s Millions of Acres”

Leah J. on “Why Is Everybody ‘Crashing Out’?"

Lorraine Yin on “No Home, No Retirement, No Kids: How Gen Z-ers See Their Future”

Max Hung Nguyen on “I Was an Undocumented Immigrant. I Beg You to See the Nuance in Our Stories.”

Margaux Simone Devenny on “Immigration Raids Add to Absence Crisis for Schools”

Maryejli M. on “We Don’t Have to Give In to the Smartphones”

Muai L. on “What My Dad Gave Me”

Neil B. on “Everyone Is Using A.I. for Everything. Is That Bad?”

Owen G. on “A Bold Idea to Raise the Birthrate: Make Parenting Less Torturous”

Richard Q. on “Starry Skies May Guide Bogong Moths Home”

Samaira Rasul on “Young Muslims Loved Zohran Mamdani, and Their Parents Listened to Them”

Saoirse L. on “Studio Ghibli’s Majestic Sensibility Is Drawing Imitators”

Shivansh B. on “They Had Come to Graduate. Their Minds Were on a Student Held by ICE.”

Shreshta G. on “The Joy and Pain of Three-Way Friendships”

Sophia J. on “Where Have All My Deep Male Friendships Gone?”

Teenie Zhang on “Can We See Our Future in China’s Cameras?”

Teo K. on “Studio Ghibli’s Majestic Sensibility is Drawing Imitators”

Viviana L. on “Should Boys Start Kindergarten a Year Later Than Girls?”

Zeqi D. A. on “Parents in Gaza are Running Out of Ways to Feed Their Children”

Zhang H. on “Instagram Wants Gen Z. What Does Gen Z Want From Instagram?”

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛第 3 周更多获奖论文

夏季阅读比赛第 2 周获胜者:‘I Do Not See Rot. I See Rest.’

Winners

Alvin Su, 15, responded to a Style article from June, “Is It OK for Your Kids to ‘Rot’ All Summer?,” by writing:

At six, I spent summer on a farm, chasing dragonflies and stacking bottle caps into kingdoms. No camps. No schedules. No countdowns. Just cicadas screaming into dusk and our bare feet pressed against hot cement. We called it summer, and it felt like freedom.

Later, summer came with a price. I learned the word enrichment, and July became a checklist. Robotics camps. Leadership programs. STEM intensives. Calendars filled before spring had even ended. But I still remember one rare summer with no plans at all. Just the slow hum of an old fan. At first, I felt unproductive. Then boredom became a window. I read books no one had assigned. I wrote poems that led nowhere. I listened to silence until it bloomed.

That’s why Hannah Seligson’s article “Is It OK for Your Kids to ‘Rot’ All Summer?” stayed with me. Some parents now defend boredom as essential. I do not see rot. I see rest. I see the rare freedom to define time instead of having it defined for you. Some families cannot afford that kind of idleness not by choice, but because doing nothing has become a privilege. Screens replace tree forts. Safety concerns replace wandering. But what if boredom is not a problem to fix, but a skill to teach?

Summer does not need to be a launchpad. Sometimes it is a rooftop. A breeze. A dragonfly resting on your sleeve. Summer should not be a productivity contest. Sometimes it is firefly chasing and popsicle-sticky hands. We just need to leave space and trust for magic to grow wild again.


Runners-Up

Bahiyyih V. on “Israel-Iran Conflict in Photos and Videos”

Chloe Careaga on “Starbucks Has a Pumpkin Spice Latte Problem in China”

Cynthia Qin on “This Elusive Antarctic Squid Was Seen for the First Time”

Dhairya M. on “We Don’t Have to Give In to the Smartphones”

Ellena L. on “How to Be an Artist"

Emma L. on “The Things Only English Can Say”

Jiayi (Iris) Li on “We May Soon Be Telling a Very Different Kind of Story About Dementia”

Kate L. on “How to Be an Artist”

Morgan C. on “The Peacock Chair and the Black Experience”

Olivia on “Our 21 Best Chocolate Chip Cookie Recipes”

Olivia G. on “Why Is Everybody ‘Crashing Out’?”

Ruby L. on “Don’t Pity a Woman Eating Alone”

Sophie T. on a recipe for Zha Jiang Mian

Victoria D. on “What Makes a Food Ultraprocessed?”

________

Honorable Mentions

Alexey Pak on “The Surefire Way to Cook Perfect Rice (Without a Rice Cooker)”

Allison P. on “In Singapore, Grandmothers Dive Into Aging With a Splash"

Amy X. on “History is Culinary”

Ashlyn L. on “Looking at a Stranger and Seeing Myself”

Ayaan on “History Is Culinary”

Caris Co on “‘Love on the Spectrum’ Delivers on the Promise of Reality TV”

Chelsea G. on “Let Students Finish the Whole Book. It Could Change Their Lives.”

Dhairya M. on “We Don’t Have to Give In to the Smartphones”

Divyansh on “Why California’s Wildfires Could Be Brutal This Summer”

Erin J. on “School Shooting Suspect Slipped Past Security via Unsecured Door, Police Say”

Fred Z. on “Why California’s Wildfires Could Be Brutal This Summer”

Isaac L. on “Finding God, and Nietzche, in the Hamas Tunnels of Gaza”

Julia D. on “Living to Die Well”

Leah T. on “How to Tackle Your To-Do List if You Struggle with Executive Functioning”

Max Amat on “Have We Been Thinking About A.D.H.D. All Wrong?”

Medha M. on “We Underestimate the Manosphere at Our Peril”

Neil B. on “The Subversive Joy of BookTok”

Pratham F. on “These Waterproof Hiking Sandals Are Ugly. I Love Them Anyway.”

Preston Liu on “How Trump Is Changing FEMA as Hurricane Season Begins”

Samaira Rasul on “It’s Not Just a Feeling: Data Shows Boys and Young Men Are Falling Behind”

Seojun L. on “Where Have All My Deep Male Friendships Gone?”

Sylvia on “What to Know About Israel’s Strikes and Iran’s Retaliation”

William C. on “As the Dalai Lama Turns 90, His Exiled Nation Faces a Moment of Truth”

Yan Z. on “My Father Never Escaped His Rage and Anxiety. Can I?”

Yuwei Gao on “I Got $4 a Week in Food Stamps. This Is the Reality of Hunger in America.”

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛第 2 周更多获奖论文

夏季阅读比赛第 1 周获胜者:‘The Authoritarian Playbook Is Always the Same’: The Week 1 Winner of Our Summer Reading Contest’

Winners

Alexander M., 16, from Denmark, responded to a short Opinion video from May, “We Study Fascism, and We’re Leaving the U.S.,” by writing:

I remember panic flooding the room — lit by the flickering blue light of a police car outside — during a gathering in support of political prisoners. I remember saying goodbye to my brother, worrying he would not return from the protests. I grew up in Russia as Putin’s tyranny strengthened, and I fear that many more will soon have memories like this.

The authoritarian playbook is always the same: first, the state comes for marginalized groups no one cares about; soon, the media and activists; then your friends and family. The video talks about the Americans’ belief in exceptionalism: “Fascism can happen elsewhere but not here.” Russians believed the same. Yet, here we are: the government is killing people for dissent, waging an aggressive war, and threatening the rest of the world with nuclear weapons.

The authors mention the words Russians learn from the cradle (proizvol, prodazhnost). I would like to add one more term to this list: silovik (plur. siloviki). My body freezes when I hear this word. A silovik is a state worker who uses force without any restraint. Persecutes, kidnaps, imprisons — whatever.

“You get out sooner rather than later,” the video warns. Sadly, it is true. I had to do the same — leave even before I started high school. But if there is a lesson from Russia, it is very simple: those who are safe must help the victims of siloviki by organizing legal defense, publicity, and resistance.

Runners-Up

In alphabetical order by the writer’s first name.

Adrian L. on “The Very Gay Life of Edmund White”

Bowen Raymond Jiang on a Learning Network writing prompt, “Pen and Pencil”

Emily X. on “Are You Asian American? Let’s Talk About Your (Gold) Jewelry”

Kaylee Dang on “Trivia and ‘Jeopardy!’ Could Save Our Republic”

Marceline S. on “No Home, No Retirement, No Kids: How Gen Z-ers See Their Future”

Max Hung Nguyen on “50 Years After Saigon’s Fall, ‘the Wall’ Reflects and Collects a Nation’s Trauma”

Samaira Gaind on “Don’t Pity a Woman Eating Alone”

Samantha D. on “Tensions Flare Between Protesters and Law Enforcement in L.A.”

Seojin Kim on “Does Hot Lemon Water Have Any Health Benefits?”

Shitong Z. on “Eating Your Way Through Europe. Or Anywhere, Really.”

Taisiia on “A Girl Struggles to Survive Her Country’s War and Her Own”

Taylor Gaines on “Has America Given Up on Children’s Learning?”

Yueqian on “Visions of My Father”

Yukang L. on “Trump and Musk Alliance Crumbles Amid Public Threats and Insults”

Zachi Elias on “When Dementia Changes a Loved One’s Personality”

________

Honorable Mentions

Abigail C. on “Why Are Cats Such a Medical Black Box?”

Addison A. on “Trump Administration More Than Doubles Federal Deployments to Los Angeles”

Adhi on ”Risking Their Lives to ‘Self-Deport’ “

Angela Sun on The Truth About Dreams

Anya W. on “You’re a Friend, Tofu”

Audley on “Losing International Students Could Devastate Many Colleges”

Bailey on “A New Headache for Honest Students: Proving They Didn’t Use A.I.”

Dweny G. on “A.I. Killed the Math Brain”

Grady W. on “The Man of the Moment Is 3,000 Years Old”

Emeline Z. on “Say Goodbye to Your Kid’s Imaginary Friends”

Jerry L. on “Who Would Steal New York City’s Pigeons? Mother Pigeon Thought She Knew”

Leah T. on “Trump Administration Halts Harvard’s Ability to Enroll International Students”

Olivia G. on “The 100 Best Restaurants in New York City in 2025”

ShiYi Yang on “A Girl Struggles to Survive Her Country’s War and Her Own”

Stephan A. on “It’s Not Just a Feeling: Data Shows Boys and Young Men Are Falling Behind”

Tiffany W. on “The Things Only English Can Say”

Wei Z. on “What to Know About the Immigration Protests in Los Angeles”

Yanxi D. on “Trump Administration Halts Harvard’s Ability to Enroll International Students”

Yuying F. on “A Global Flourishing Study Finds That Young Adults, Well, Aren’t”

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛第 1 周更多获奖论文

2025 纽约时报夏季读写比赛全面指南看这篇!纽约时报夏季读写比赛获奖秘诀是什么?

纽约时报夏季读写比赛The New York Times Summer Reading Contest)是由《纽约时报》自2010年起每年夏季举办的全球性写作竞赛,面向全球13–19岁的中学生。作为最具影响力的青少年读写赛事之一,它不仅鼓励学生关注世界动态,更强调批判性思维、个人表达与社会责任感的结合。

一、2025赛事关键安排

2025年赛事时间

2025年6月7日 – 8月16日(共10周)

每周五发布新话题,投稿截止于下周五上午9:00(美东时间)

参赛对象与资格:

地区 年龄要求
美国、英国学生 13–19岁
其他国家学生 16–19岁

注:参赛者必须在比赛期间处于中学阶段(未进入大学)。

竞赛内容与形式

核心问题

“What got your attention in The Times this week?”
(本周《纽约时报》上的哪些内容引起了你的关注?)

参赛者需从当周《纽约时报》发布的新闻报道、社论、照片、视频、播客或专栏文章中选择一个内容,围绕上述问题进行回应。

提交形式与要求

提交类型 格式要求
文字作品 ≤ 250词(约1500字符),语言为英文
视频作品 ≤ 90秒,可包含旁白、字幕、剪辑等
原创性 必须为原创,禁止抄袭、代写、AI生成或重复使用已发表作品
独立完成 不可团队合作
引用要求 必须提供所选文章的完整URL或标题

提示:每周官网会提供数十个免费推荐链接,涵盖适合青少年阅读的社会、科技、文化、环境等主题。

二、评审标准(满分100分)

评分维度 占比 评审重点
个人联系 30% 作品是否清晰表达了你为何被这篇文章吸引?是否结合了你的生活经历、兴趣、价值观或成长背景?评委想看到“你和这篇文章之间的故事”。
批判性思维 30% 是否对文章观点提出质疑?是否有深入反思?是否识别偏见、逻辑漏洞或信息来源的可信度?是否拓展了原文的思考边界?
原文引用 20% 是否精准引用文章中的具体细节、数据或语句来支撑你的观点?避免泛泛而谈。
语言与风格 10% 表达是否自然、有个性?语法拼写是否准确?避免模板化、空洞口号。
规则遵守 10% 是否符合字数、格式、原创性等所有比赛规则?

三、获奖机制与奖项设置

比赛每周评选一次,参赛者可选择任意一周或多周连续投稿,增加获奖机会。

奖项类型 数量 奖励形式
Winner(优胜者) 每周1名 作品刊登于《纽约时报》官网,署名展示
Runner-up(亚军) 每周若干名 作品展示于官网“Runners-up”栏目
Honorable Mentions(荣誉提名) 每周若干名 名单公布,鼓励参与

特别亮点

得奖的学生作品和姓名将有机会被刊登在纽约时报官网。

多次获奖者在大学申请中极具竞争力,尤其适用于申请人文、新闻、社会学、国际关系等专业。

四、获奖作品四大成功秘诀

1. 个人经历锚点设计

时间线锚定法

选取具体时间节点而非泛泛而谈,增强真实感。

认知冲突制造

将个人经历与文章观点形成张力。

2.展现思维转变

展示你在阅读前后的认知变化,体现批判性成长。

关键词:质疑 → 反思 → 转变 → 行动

3.补充权威报道的“另一面”

《纽约时报》代表“官方视角”,你可以提供“个人视角”作为补充。

价值点:让全球媒体听到多元声音

4.选择小众角度,避免“扎堆热点”

热门话题(如战争、明星新闻)投稿量大,竞争激烈。选择冷门但深刻的主题更容易脱颖而出。

扫码查看历届获奖优秀论文,导师一对一竞赛规划!

为什么纽约时报夏季读写竞赛容易获奖?附备赛建议与时间规划!

《纽约时报》夏季读写竞赛是目前最容易获奖、最值得参与的国际写作赛事之一,它不仅门槛低、获奖率高,而且兼具学术价值与创意表达空间,是提升背景、积累作品、展示思想深度的理想平台。

一、参赛门槛低:写作类竞赛中的“入门级选择”

无需学术研究或复杂论证

核心要求:阅读一篇你感兴趣的《纽约时报》文章,写出你的感受与思考。

不需要做深入的文献综述、实证分析或数据建模,只需要表达个人观点、情感共鸣和所学所得

非常适合初次尝试写作竞赛的学生,尤其是语言基础中等但有想法的同学。

字数限制友好(250词左右)

原文要求不超过 1500字符(含空格),换算成英文单词大约为 230–250词

相比动辄上千词的写作竞赛,这个长度更易聚焦重点,避免冗长拖沓。

对时间紧张的学生非常友好,即使一周内完成也完全可行。

二、灵活的表达方式:新增视频投稿选项

文字+视频双模式,满足不同风格学生需求

文字版:写读后感,锻炼逻辑表达与语言组织能力。

视频版:提交一段不超过90秒的视频,用口语化方式表达对文章的理解。

视频形式更适合擅长演讲、表达能力强、不擅长书面写作的学生,增加了创意展示空间。

提示:视频投稿可以加入背景音乐、图片、动画等元素,提升表现力和感染力。

三、赛制设计优势:高频次、多机会、获奖面广

每周一轮,持续开放投稿窗口

比赛从每年6月开始,持续到8月底或9月初(具体以当年通知为准)。

每周二开放新主题,你可以根据当周的文章进行创作并投稿。

即使一次未获奖,也可以继续参与后续轮次,多次尝试,提升获奖概率

奖项设置广泛,获奖机会多

每周评选:

1位 Winner

若干 Runner-up(提名奖)

Honorable Mentions(优秀奖)

所有奖项作品都会在官网发布,供全球读者阅读欣赏。

评审阵容专业,反馈权威

由《纽约时报》记者、编辑及教育专家组成的评审团。

虽然不是学术类竞赛,但其品牌背书和影响力在美本申请中具有很高的认可度。

四、对升学和背景提升的价值

维度 说明
申请加分项 展现批判性思维、语言表达能力和对社会议题的关注,是很好的软实力体现。
作品可作为文书素材 获奖内容或思路可提炼为Common App主文书或附加文书的内容来源。
国际平台曝光 获奖作品将在《纽约时报》官网上展示,提升个人国际影响力。
适合跨学科背景学生 无论你是偏文科、理科还是艺术生,只要能表达清晰,都能找到切入点。

五、备赛建议与时间规划

🗓 推荐时间安排(以每轮比赛为例):

时间节点 内容
第1天 浏览本周推荐文章,选择感兴趣的一篇
第2天 精读文章,做笔记,整理主要观点与个人感悟
第3天 撰写初稿(控制在250词以内)或准备视频脚本
第4天 修改润色,检查语法与表达准确性
第5天 提交作品(截止时间为美国东部时间周二下午)

小技巧:可以一次性准备多个版本稿件,应对多轮投稿;也可将同一文章用于其他写作竞赛或文书练习。

六、适合谁参加?

✅ 初次尝试写作竞赛的高中生
✅ 英语表达能力较强但缺乏项目经历的学生
✅ 想要丰富课外活动履历、提升大学申请软实力的学生
✅ 对社会议题、新闻评论、人文社科感兴趣的同学

扫码查看历届获奖优秀论文,导师一对一竞赛规划!

学生公开信比赛优胜者—Trump: Don’t Delete the History That Makes Us American

这封信的作者是Cherry Creek High School in Greenwood Village, Colo. 16 岁的Peter Philpott,他是学生公开信大赛的前 10 名获胜者之一,我们收到了 9,946 份参赛作品。


Dear President Trump,

On snow days of my childhood, after the forts were built and hills sledded, and as the wintry sky began to darken, I’d go home and watch historical documentaries about airplanes. My favorite era was World War II, and one day I stumbled upon a film about the Tuskegee Airmen, who broke the color barrier of American flight in their famous red-tail planes. I was hooked.

These men introduced me to the best of America — glory and courage — but also its worst: racism that undercut their striving and punished them for their triumphs. The Tuskegee Airmen excelled when skeptics expected them to fail. They accomplished more than many all-white squadrons, flying effective bomber-escort missions, defeating Germans in dogfights, suffering exceptionally few losses. Then they returned to Jim Crow’s America: a stark contrast from the victory parades awaiting their white counterparts.

But you, President Trump, want to erase those stories. You have made “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” one of your primary targets. That term refers to improving job opportunities for marginalized people, but your anti-DEI policies also attack history, culture, and education. Your administration eliminated (temporarily, due to public outcry) the Tuskegee Airmen from the Department of Defense’s website, along with Navajo Code Talkers and Colin Powell. Executive orders like “Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling” and “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History” have led schools to purge books by and about Jackie Robinson and Maya Angelou. The National Park Service attempted to explain the Underground Railroad without mentioning slavery. You laud these actions as “patriotic” because you think truthful history is “subversive” and “anti-American.”

You want us to think DEI policies thwart a merit-based system in which only the most qualified get the job or a place in history books. But what DEI really does is remove obstacles, freeing talented people to take flight in ways that — like the skill and bravery of the Tuskegee Airmen — help us all. It’s so essential that colleges and businesses are seeking ways to continue this work without attracting your attention. Dismantling barriers is truly a key to making America great.

American history is a story of achievement and struggle: a contest between our best and worst selves. It’s a fact, not a “distorted narrative driven by ideology,” that the Tuskegee Airmen had to fight to excel — just like Robinson and Johnson. Their trials, inseparable from their successes, are the stories that engrossed me in our complicated, messy, inclusive, and fascinating history. Acknowledging this history, learning from it, seeing the obstacles, and obliterating them: an honest reckoning with our past helps free us to be our best.

Mr. President, we should have pride in our accomplishments and remorse for our mistakes. We should learn from our history, and course-correct. Let’s not be afraid to elevate all of us. When the military tried it back in 1941, they found some of the finest pilots to ever fly.

Sincerely,
Peter Philpott


Works Cited

Collins, Jeremy. “The Tuskegee Airmen: An Interview with the Leading Authority.” The National WWII Museum | New Orleans, 14 July 2020.

Elias, Jennifer, and Annie Palmer. “In Trump Era, Companies Are Rebranding DEI Efforts, Not Giving Up.” CNBC, 30 March 2025.

Ismay, John, and Kate Selig. “Naval Academy Takes Steps to End Diversity Policies in Books and Admissions.” The New York Times, 29 March 2025.

Otterman, Sharon, et al. “Trump’s D.E.I. Ban Has Been Open to Interpretation in Schools.” The New York Times, 13 Feb. 2025.

Sandiford, Michele. “DoD Continues Removal of Historic Content from Websites, Citing DEI.” Federal News Network — Helping Feds Meet Their Mission., Federal News Network, 20 March 2025.

Swaine, Jon, and Jeremy B Merrill. “Amid Anti-DEI Push, National Park Service Rewrites History of Underground Railroad.” The Washington Post, 6 April 2025.

Trump, Donald. “Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling.” The White House, 29 Jan. 2025.

Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.” The White House, 27 March 2025.

Tuskegee University. “Tuskegee Airmen Facts | Tuskegee University.” Tuskegee.edu, 2019.

学生公开信比赛优胜者—Dear Ohio State Senators: I’m a Student, Not a Substitute

这封信的作者是 Olentangy Liberty High School in Powell, Ohio 17 岁的Michelle Huang,他是学生公开信大赛的前 10 名获胜者之一,我们收到了 9,946 份参赛作品。


Dear Ohio State Senators,

When I picture child labor, I imagine grainy photographs from another century: children with dirt-streaked faces working mines, mills, and factory lines. I don’t picture 2025, and I certainly don’t picture Ohio.

But earlier this year, federal agents found more than two dozen minors illegally working inside Gerber’s Poultry in Kidron, Ohio. Many of them were immigrants from Guatemala. These children, some as young as 14, were working in dangerous conditions: handling heavy machinery and performing late-night sanitation shifts.

This wasn’t an isolated incident. The New York Times reports that child labor violations in the U.S. have surged by 69 percent since 2018. In 2023 alone, over 5,800 minors were found working in violation of labor laws, hundreds of them in dangerous roles. Here in Ohio, those violations have increased by 31 percent.

The response? Instead of strengthening protections, Ohio introduced Senate Bill 50 — a law that would loosen restrictions, letting 14 and 15-year-olds work longer hours during the school year. Supporters call it a solution to the labor shortage. But we, the children, aren’t the answer to adult problems.

I’m a high school student. I wake up before the sun rises to finish calculus homework, bounce between college classes and club meetings, and squeeze in time to study for the ACT. My days are packed with ambition, not out of obligation, but out of hope — hope that what I’m doing now might open doors in the future. That’s what childhood should offer: a runway, not a cage. So when I hear about kids my age scrubbing meatpacking floors at midnight, I can’t help but wonder what futures they’ve been forced to forfeit. What subjects they’re too tired to learn. What dreams they’ve quietly folded away.

This isn’t some labor shortage driven anomaly; it’s a symptom of a broken system, one where vulnerable kids are treated as expendable labor, not students or future citizens.

And instead of facing this crisis head-on, lawmakers are rolling back the very protections that once kept us safe. In Florida, Governor Ron DeSantis is backing legislation that removes restrictions on how long and how late teenagers can work — eliminating mandated breaks and enabling overnight shifts. Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds recently signed a bill allowing children as young as 14 to work in meatpacking facilities, arguing it would help them learn the “dignity in work.”

This isn’t about empowering youth. It’s about replacing adult workers with cheaper, more compliant children — it’s about cutting corners and avoiding real investment in wages, training, and workplace safety. It’s about adult failures, masked as opportunity.

So this is my ask to you, Ohio lawmakers: stop normalizing child labor. Don’t lower the bar. Raise the alarm. Call for hearings. Demand real data. Investigate the industries that quietly profit from this exploitation. And most importantly, listen to the kids who don’t have the luxury of writing letters like this — because they’re too busy working jobs they were never meant to have.

Clocking out,
Michelle Huang


Works Cited

Ainsley, Julia, Strickler, Laura and Martinez, Didi. Feds Found More Than Two Dozen Minors Working in Ohio Poultry Plant. NBC News. 20 Oct. 2023.

Iyer, Kaanita. Iowa Governor Signs Bill to Loosen Child Labor Laws. CNN.com, 27 May 2023.

Florida Bill to Allow Teens to Work Overnight Hours on School Days Moves Forward. cbsnews.com. 26 March 2025.

New York Times Editorial Board. The Dangerous Race to Put More Children to Work. The New York Times, 24 March 2023.

Roque, Lorena and Mehta, Sapna. CLASP Federal Recommendations to Combat Child Labor. CLASP. 7 March 2024.

Smith, Heather. Deregulating Child Labor Will Harm Ohio’s Kids. Policy Matters Ohio. 25 Feb. 2025.

学生公开信比赛优胜者—The Great Subscription Trap

这封信的作者是the Kent School in Conn.17 岁的Michael Shin,她是学生公开信大赛的前 10 名获胜者之一,我们收到了 9,946 份参赛作品。


Dear Subscription Services Users,

By the time you read this letter, it might be locked behind a $5 monthly paywall. But let’s face it — you’ll probably pay for it anyway.

My crusade against the subscription apocalypse started with an HP printer demanding $1.50 monthly for ink cartridges. (Yes, my printer now has a protection racket.) Now, car companies want monthly fees for heated seats and automatic garage doors. Welcome to 2025, where keeping your posterior warm costs $20 a month. What’s next — a subscription to use your refrigerator’s ice maker? A monthly fee to unlock your microwave’s popcorn button?

The subscription tsunami is already here. In 2020, more American households had Amazon Prime than owned pets or decorated Christmas trees. From movies to news articles, monthly memberships have colonized the internet faster than cat videos. Between 2018 and 2021, average subscription spending per U.S. consumer surged from $237 to $273. This trend shows no signs of slowing down, as companies realize they can slice and dice their services into bite-sized monthly payments.

Sure, subscription services once seemed like economic heroes. Streaming services swooped in like caped crusaders, fighting internet piracy and delivering thousands of shows through one platform. Companies got steady revenue streams, and we got entertainment buffets. But like any all-you-can-eat buffet, we’re now paying for far more than we actually consume.

Speaking of buffets — I tallied my monthly subscriptions: $215 a month for Netflix, Hulu, Disney Plus, HBO Max, Crunchyroll, Apple TV, Amazon Prime, YouTube Premium, Spotify, Adobe, and Splice. (I even relied on an NYT membership to write this letter — oh, the irony.) These forgotten subscriptions silently raid my wallet like ninjas in the night, each one small enough to escape notice, but together forming an army of monetary drain.

Today’s streaming platforms are like identical quintuplets wearing different outfits — same content, different logos. Yet we keep paying for multiple platforms to watch a handful of exclusive shows. They make cancellation harder than solving a Rubik’s cube blindfolded, ensuring monthly payments stack up like pancakes at a breakfast buffet. Most subscriptions get less use than that exercise equipment gathering dust in your garage. Studies reveal the average U.S. consumer underestimates their monthly payment by up to $100, proving how effectively these companies have mastered the art of invisible billing.

The subscription revolution isn’t coming — it’s here, replacing ownership with eternal rentals. Each purchase increasingly comes with strings attached, turning consumers into perpetual renters of products they once owned outright. Time to audit your digital expenses like a forensic accountant. Hunt down those forgotten subscriptions lurking in your credit card statements. Cancel redundant services faster than you can say “monthly fee.” This isn’t about penny-pinching — it’s about outsmarting corporate strategies designed to pick your pocket one subscription at a time.

Sincerely,
Michael Shin

(Unlock premium signature for just $9.99/month!)


Works Cited

Moses, Claire. What Your Favorite Streaming Services Will Cost You in 2024. The New York Times, 29 Dec. 2023.

O’Brien, Sarah. ‘It’s a Slippery Slope’: Most Consumers Underestimate Monthly Subscription Costs By at Least $100, Study Says. CNBC, 6 Sept. 2022.

Robinson, Cheryl. Subscription Service Model: How to Build a Profitable Business.” Forbes, 9 March 2024.

There Are Now More Amazon Prime Memberships than Christmas Trees, Household Pets, Voters, Landlines and Gun Owners.” Fosdick Fufillment, 2 Aug. 2020.

Tucker, Sean. BMW Quietly Launches In-Car Subscriptions in U.S. Kelley Blue Book, 3 Jan. 2023.

学生公开信比赛优胜者—For the Girls Who Were Never Meant to Be

这封信的作者是Nazarbayev Intellectual School of Astana in Astana, Kazakhstan17 岁的Fariza Fazyl,她是学生公开信大赛的前 10 名获胜者之一,我们收到了 9,946 份参赛作品。


Dear Ulbolsyn,

You don’t know me, but I know you. I’ve met in a hundred different places. In classrooms, at bus stops, in stories told in hushed voices over tea. I’ve met you in the way your mother’s voice softens when she says your name, as if it’s an apology. I’ve met you in the way your father looks past you, still waiting for the son that never came.

I’ve met you, Ұлболсын, and I have never once envied you.

My name is Fariza. It means “light, precious gem.” A name that stands on its own, one that was given to me not as an apology, but as a blessing. My name is simple. It means nothing but me. No silent wishes for a different child. When I was born, no one folded my name into a quiet, desperate hope for something better.

But you. You were born with expectations stitched into your skin. Your name was the first thing the world ever gave you, and it was never really yours.

Ulbolsyn, Ұлболсын: Let there be a boy.

That’s what they called you. That’s what they wished for when they held you for the first time. Not you. Someone else. And yet, you stayed. You learned to carry the weight of their disappointment with a quiet kind of grace.

In Kazakh culture, names hold profound significance. They often reflect the hopes and aspirations of families. For example, my name held a hope of shining throughout my life. However, a particular naming tradition has persisted, and girls are given names beginning with “Ұл” (“Ul”), meaning “boy.” For instance, names such as Ұлболсын (Ulbolsyn), Ұлтуар (Ultuar), and Ұлжан (Ulzhan). These names translate to “Let there be a boy,” “A boy will be born,” and “Soul of a boy,” respectively. Each one a reminder that their birth was not the one their parents had been waiting for.

And it’s not just here. In India, in China, in so many places where being born a girl is a tragedy, the numbers tell a story we don’t want to hear. In China, for every 100 girls, there are 117 boys. In some parts of India, there are 156. Nature and genetics have it that the ratio of girls to boys should be 1 to 1. However, across the world, parents are getting rid of girls a lot more frequently. Millions of daughters aborted even before they had names.

You survived. But survival is not the same as being wanted.

Not in a country where, between 1905 and 2019, over 75,400 girls were given names like yours — names that apologized for their existence. Not in a world where parents whisper to their newborn daughters, Maybe not now.

I don’t know if the people around you will ever say it. I don’t know if the world will ever make space for your name the way it should have from the start.

But I will say it, and I will mean it.

Ulbolsyn, I am so, so glad that you exist.

Sincerely,
Fariza


Works Cited

Zhulmukhametova, Zhadyra. “Пусть родится мальчик”. Зачем в Казахстане снимают фильм об Улболсын и почему это важно [“Let a boy be born.” Why is a film about Ulbolsyn being shot in Kazakhstan and why is it important?]. InformBuro, 21 Aug. 2020.

Hudson, Valerie, et al. “Surplus males: The dangers of Asia’s preference for sons.” The New York Times, 13 May 2004.

学生公开信比赛优胜者—8 Seconds

这封信的作者是Needham High School in Needham, Mass. 16 岁的Emma Hua,她是学生公开信大赛的前 10 名获胜者之一,我们收到了 9,946 份参赛作品。


Hey Screenager,

Look up for a second. No actually — just for a moment, I promise.

I know everything that you value is on that little glowing rectangle of yours: your friends, entertainment, news, and Block Blast. But have you not noticed how hard it is to focus? To enjoy a meal without your phone? How even a few seconds of boredom feel unbearable? How finishing a book for AP Lang last week felt like going to war?

Good and bad news. You’re not alone.

Last week, it hit me that I was completely tuned out in math class. I looked up, and the hieroglyphics on the board had been replaced with other lines of who-knows-what. Aside from the problem on the board, the real problem I couldn’t solve was I couldn’t get myself to focus. My mind wandered, my hands fidgeted, and my eyes darted around the room — it terrified me.

Our attention spans are shrinking. Now, with an 8-second attention span, shorter than a goldfish, you and I are wired for quick dopamine hits: short-form content, endless scrolling, a notification that Sophia commented “omg gorg” on your latest post. Dopamine hits? Sounds like something we half-listened to in health class — if you read any part of this letter, make it this: we are addicted. Deep thinking, reflection, and creativity are slipping away. Stuck on a math problem? ChatGPT. Need a makeup recommendation? Instagram. Want tips on breaking your phone addiction? YouTube. We’re losing the desire to wrestle with complex ideas, challenge ourselves intellectually, and most importantly, live presently. When those skills are lost, we lose what makes us truly unique and human.

The more we connect online, the more we are disconnecting as a society. Phones get chairs at the dinner table. Friendships are maintained through Snapchat streaks and Instagram reels. Eye contact feels awkward, and holding a long conversation feels burdensome. We are losing each other. In a generation that will soon be leading innovation, we are drowning in memorized TikTok dances instead of critical thinking and curiosity. Attention spans and discipline move humanity forward — what happens when an entire generation of people can’t focus for more than 8 seconds at a time?

Stay with me now, only one more paragraph. And here’s the thing: you still have time. You can still reclaim your focus and retrain your brain to engage in real life again. I cannot offer you a ten-step digital detox plan like the productivity influencers do on YouTube Shorts, but small steps — reading a book, setting screen limits, taking out the AirPods, and being present during meals — will give us a fighting chance of rectifying the screenager epidemic. Slowly, learn to embrace stillness, in boredom, in real life. The world needs you, your curiosity, your humanity, and your ability to think beyond 8 seconds.

Now stop reading this on your screen, and go live.
Someone Who’s Trying to Look Up More


Works Cited

Average Human Attention Span By Age: 31 Statistics.” The Treetop, Applied Behavior Analysis Therapy, 17 July 2024.

Egan, Timothy. “The Eight-Second Attention Span.” The New York Times, 22 Jan. 2016.

Shoukat, Sehar. “Cell Phone Addiction and Psychological and Physiological Health in Adolescents.” Letter. National Library of Medicine, 4 Feb. 2019.