每周都能冲奖!纽约时报夏季读写竞赛获奖文章都有什么特点?

作为一个门槛低、含金量高的写作比赛,每周都为参与者提供了锻炼写作技能和挑战自我的绝佳机会。获奖者们往往成为藤校、JHU、UCB等Top30名校的香饽饽,因此参加比赛对未来的留学申请将是一大助力!你的暑假计划准备好了吗?New York Times夏季读写比赛正在等你的参与!

1.适合学生 

全球范围内13-19岁且尚未开始本科学习学生

*注:《纽约时报》员工的子女和继子女不得参加。与时报员工住在同一家庭的青少年同理不得参加。

2.竞赛时间

2024年6月7日-8月16日

每周一次,每人每周仅可提交一份作品,参赛学生可连续每周投稿。

3.竞赛内容 

自2024年6月7日开始,每周五,官方网都会发布一个帖子并提出同样的问题:

What got your attention in The Times this week?

本周《纽约时报》上的哪些内容引起了你的关注?

学生可以自行选择纽约时报上2024年发布的任意主题下的任意一个articles, Op-Eds, videos, graphics, photos and podcasts发表自己的看法,在下周五的上午9点前(美东时间),围绕问题提交自己的回答。

2024年8月9日,官方将发布夏季读写竞赛的最后一个帖子,并开放至8月16日上午9点(美东时间)。

从2024年6月25日开始,每周二,官方将公布上一周的获胜者。

4.参赛规则 

提交不得超过1500字符,即 250~300单词。

务必提供所选《纽约时报》内容的完整链接或完整标题(注意本词条包含在字数限制内)

赛事期间的每周或任何一周均可参加,但每周只能提交一次。

作品提交截止时间为每周五上午 9 点(美东时间),逾期不予接受。

完成提交后,可以选择生成你作品提交后的链接,以便参赛者证明自己参赛。

不得抄袭、借鉴,不得由他人创建或使用AI生成。

保证原创性,不得使用已发布作品(包括校刊、其他竞赛以及其他任何地方。)

作品仅限个人提交,不支持2人或多人组队。

5.评审标准

6.奖项设置

获奖的优秀作品将有机会在《纽约时报》的官网刊登。

虽然在比赛期间每周都可以提交作品,但获奖率却极低。去年主办方总共收到近9500份参赛作品,却只有270件作品获奖。这也是该竞赛备受美国大学的认可的重要原因!

纽约时报夏季读写竞赛获奖文章都有什么特点?

1.与个人经历共鸣:

   - 将个人经历与文章内容相结合,展现个人独特的思考和感悟。

   - 通过讲述与文章相关的小故事,体现个人情感与文章主题的共鸣。

2.读前读后的变化:

   - 明确阐述读文章前后自己的态度或想法的变化。

   - 突出文章中的信息或观点如何影响了作者的思考方式和行为方法。

3.关联时效性与社会热点:

   - 选择具有时效性和社会影响力的主题,增加文章的吸引力。

   - 结合个人经历,为官方报道提供不同的视角或补充。

4.产生小众角度:  

   - 从独特的、少有人涉足的视角切入,展现文章的个性和创新性。

   - 避免陈词滥调,力求以新颖的角度和观点吸引评委的注意。

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛更多获奖论文+导师亮点评析+备赛书单

纽约时报夏季读写拿奖容易吗?NYT夏季读写竞赛参赛&获奖情况分析!

纽约时报夏季读写比赛由全球十大新闻媒体之一的《纽约时报》(New York Times)主办,面向全球中学生,每年夏季举办,持续10周,吸引了全球超过8万名中学生的参与。趁着这个夏天,与纽约时报展开一场奇妙机遇!

纽约时报夏季读写比赛获奖情况

1.参赛人数与获奖概率:

近年来,纽约时报夏季读写比赛的参赛人数总体呈增加趋势,2023年总计有10144人参赛。

2022年总计有11545人参赛。

2021年总计有9500人参赛。

根据每周参赛人数的变化显示,不难发现第一周参赛人数最少。从第六周开始,每周的参赛人数都会在1000人左右,并逐渐增加。最后,第十周(也就是最后一周)的参赛人数最多。可能是因为比赛接近尾声,许多人希望抓住最后的机会参与其中,争取获得好成绩或者奖项。

因此,早期参赛相对竞争较小,获奖概率可能更高。

2.总获奖率趋势:

每周平均总获奖率如下:

2023年平均总获奖率为1.72%。

2022年平均总获奖率为1.97%。

2021年平均总获奖率为3.08%。

近三年的总获奖率逐年下降,从2021年的3.08%降至2023年的1.72%。这反映了比赛难度的增加和竞争的激烈程度。

在比赛的不同阶段,总获奖率呈现不同的变化。特别是第一周的总获奖率相对较高,越往后,总获奖率会越低。这样的趋势在三年的比赛中反复出现,因此,建议大家还是尽早参赛可能增加获奖的机会。

获奖策略建议

考虑到早期参赛的竞争相对较小以及总获奖率较高的特点,建议有意参加比赛的选手尽早报名并投稿

除了关注获奖率外,选手还应注重提升作品的质量和独特性,以更大概率脱颖而出。这包括与个人经历结合、展现读前读后的变化、关联时效性与社会热点以及产生小众角度等方面。

虽然纽约时报夏季读写比赛的竞争日益激烈,但通过了解参赛人数与获奖概率的关系以及总获奖率的变化趋势,并采取相应的策略,选手仍有机会在比赛中脱颖而出并获得奖项。

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛更多获奖论文+导师亮点评析+备赛书单

低门槛易冲奖!纽约时报夏季读写竞赛有什么优势?

纽约时报夏季读写比赛已经进入第六周!想要参加本周比赛的同学们需在东部时间7月19日上午9点之前提交作品。随着前几周比赛的进行,相信大家对这场比赛已经有了更深入的了解。那么今天就来谈谈参加纽约时报写作竞赛有什么优势?

纽约时报夏季读写竞赛有什么优势?

1.低门槛与低成本:

   - 参赛无需支付任何费用,降低了参赛的经济门槛。

   - 字数限制相对较少(不超过1500字符或250个单词),以及新增的视频提交方式,为学生提供了更广阔的创意发挥空间,同时也减轻了写作负担。

   - 不需要作者进行大量的论证或前期科研,只需表达清晰的想法和学习内容,使得参赛过程更为简便。

2.参赛便捷性:

   - 纽约时报作为知名媒体,其写作竞赛具有较高的知名度和信誉度,但门槛相对较低,使得更多学生有机会参与。

   - 夏季读写活动在题材和字数上均设定了较为宽松的限制,不占用过多的学习和活动时间,灵活的时间安排使得学生能够从容应对。

3.赛制优势:

   - 采用每周一轮的赛制,每周开放投稿并颁发奖项,这种持续性的比赛设置增加了学生参与的机会和频次。

   - 在整个赛季中,学生可以多次投稿,每次都有机会获得奖项,这种赛制设计提高了学生的参与热情和获奖可能性。

   - 每周评选出的获奖者包括winner、runner-up和honorable mentions,获奖率相对较高,给学生带来了更多的荣誉感和成就感。

4.提升与展示平台:

   - 参与该竞赛不仅能够锻炼学生的写作和表达能力,还有机会在纽约时报这样的国际舞台上展示自己的才华和创意。

   - 获奖作品更有可能获得广泛的传播和认可,对学生的个人发展和社会影响力有积极的推动作用。

5.促进学习与成长:   

   - 通过阅读纽约时报的文章并撰写读后感或制作视频,学生能够接触到更广阔的知识领域和更多元的观点,从而拓宽视野,提升综合素养。

   - 参赛过程中的不断修改和完善作品,也有助于培养学生的批判性思维、创新能力和解决问题的能力。

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛第四周更多获奖论文+导师亮点评析

学生公开信比赛优胜者—A Letter From a ‘Loser’

这封信由 Ridge High School in Basking Ridge, N.J. 16 岁的 Anya Wang 撰写,是学习网络学生公开信竞赛的前 9 名获奖者之一,我们收到了 8,065 份参赛作品。

Dear The New York Times Learning Network,

I’m not sure if you imagined that someone would write a letter to you when you announced that we could write an open letter “to anyone you like.” Well, whether or not you did, here I am.

Don’t get me wrong. I admire your contests and resources deeply. But after three years of pouring hours into your contests yet receiving nothing but a copy-pasted rejection email in response, I want to bring a facet of your contests into scrutiny. A facet that you may have never thought twice about.

That is, your policy that you do not provide feedback on submitted essays.

I get it. You received 12,592 submissions for your last editorial contest. But after all, you’ve named yourself the Learning Network. Feedback is how students grow. It’s how we learn. Without it, every time I’ve received a “You lost!” email from you, I’ve felt sorely disappointed and lost, not knowing where to look or what to change to improve my writing.

And I know that I’m not alone. In fact, your contests leave the vast majority of your participants stranded in the dark. In last year’s editorial contest, the chance of getting recognized — not even winning — was a measly 1.199 percent. Winning was bestowed upon just 0.087 percent of your participants — a rate almost 40 times lower than Harvard’s class of 2027 acceptance rate.

You want to be prestigious. You want to be selective. But what you’re creating for the thousands of hopeful teens who enter your contests — nearly 100,000 in just your editorial contests alone — is not a network for learning and growth. Instead, you’re creating a cutthroat competition where feedback and encouragement are given at a rate even below what the Ivy League has deemed ethical. It’s discouraging and unresponsive — a culture far from conducive to learning.

Additionally, you’ve commonly mentioned a Round 4 in your recognized finalists, but never explained how Rounds 3, 2 and 1 work. I desperately want you to tell us more. What if you discreetly told each participant which round their essay reached, and then shared some general thresholds that prevented essays from proceeding to the next round?

I hope that won’t be too logistically difficult — you probably already need to sort essays into different rounds to determine contest winners. I also hope that you won’t balk at the supposed decrease in prestige such a change might bring. You’re a global leader in journalism. You know how things are for teens right now. You know, with the world changing at breakneck speed, with everything from A.I. to full-blown wars flung at us, how sharply teen voices demand to be heard.

Don’t leave us in the dark. Shine a ray of light into our writing, and prepare all teen voices to take the stage.

Signed,
A “Loser”


Works Cited

Harvard College Admissions and Financial Aid. Admissions Statistics | Harvard. Harvard College, 2024.

Schulten, Katherine. How to Write an Open Letter: A Guide to Our Opinion Contest. The New York Times, 19 March 2024.

The New York Times Learning Network. Open Letters: Our New Opinion-Writing Contest. The New York Times, 12 March 2024.

The New York Times Learning Network. The Israel-Hamas War: A Forum for Young People to React. The New York Times, 16 Oct. 2023.

The New York Times Learning Network. The Winners of Our 10th Annual Student Editorial Contest. The New York Times, 29 June 2023.

The New York Times Learning Network. What Students Are Saying About Learning to Write in the Age of A.I. The New York Times, 25 Jan. 2024.

学生公开信比赛优胜者—Insulin: Drugs vs. Dividends

这封信由印第安纳州布卢明顿市 Bloomington 高中 17 岁的奥利弗·博洪 (Oliver Bohon) 撰写,是学习网络学生公开信竞赛的前 9 名获奖者之一,我们收到了 8,065 份参赛作品。

Eli Lilly,

As a Type 1 diabetic living in Indiana (where you’re headquartered), I’ve known your name for a long time. Every meal I have your insulin delivered into my bloodstream, something I’ll need my entire life. But I’ve come to associate your name with frustration, not gratitude.

You, alongside Novo Nordisk and Sanofi, control 90-plus percent of the insulin market worldwide. You posture about capping costs, providing aid, serving the people first. These claims make you look great — you’re doing all you can to aid your patients.

Except you aren’t.

Frederick Banting, Charles Best, John Macleod and James Collip helped to discover and purify insulin in 1921. In 1923, Banting, Best and Collip sold their patents on the drug for $1 each.

The reason? As Banting said, “Insulin belongs to the world.”

Yet so many people today still find themselves on short supply of that miracle drug — rationing it, fighting with insurance over it, buying it from third parties.

What happened? We’re no longer in the days of purifying pig pancreas extract. We have synthetic biology! We can mass produce insulin — more than we’d ever need — and it’s cheap, easy, and efficient. It’s the simplest business imaginable. Think about it — I, alongside countless others, can’t survive without insulin. I’m reliant on you. So you got to work approaching my life like an economics class — there’s always demand, so why not increase prices?

But (eventually) political pressure started, and for once you seemed threatened. So, about a year ago, you announced that you’d limit the cost of a vial of non-branded insulin to $25. In the announcement, you boasted about how this is the lowest price since 1999.

The lowest price since 1999 still has a profit margin of 417 percent (at $6 per vial). Obviously, you’re a company — you exist to profit. But to claim you’re doing any charity with this is a farce. You gouged prices for decades, cut them down once any pressure was applied, and then acted a hero for it. Even the price cut wasn’t selfless! It helped you avoid millions of dollars of rebates under the American Rescue Act. You did the bare minimum and nothing more.

There’s an issue when a life-or-death drug can be played like a stock — where companies are incentivized to gouge the prices of their drugs for the patient while paying their C.E.O. $26.5 million per year.

I don’t have any power. I can’t boycott insulin, nor undo the pain you’ve caused. What I hope to share with this letter is that I’m tired. I’m tired of the Eli Lilly name being associated with greed over patient care. I’m tired and frustrated, and I think people have the right to understand why, and to determine whether such a company deserves support.

Oliver Bohon, a diabetic


Works Cited

100 Years of Insulin. Diabetes UK.

Feldman, William B, and Benjamin N Rome. The Rise and Fall of the Insulin Pricing Bubble. Vol. 6. JAMA Network Open. 14 June 2023.

Knox, Ryan. Insulin Insulated: Barriers to Competition and Affordability in the United States Insulin Market. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, Volume 7, Issue 1, January-June 2020.

Lilly Cuts Insulin Prices by 70% and Caps Patient Insulin Out-of-Pocket Costs at $35 per Month. Eli Lilly and Company New Release. 1 March 2023.

Robbins, Rebecca. Eli Lilly Says It Will Cut the Price of Insulin. The New York Times, 1 March 2023.

夏季阅读比赛第 3 周获胜者:‘As a Muslim, Those Words Pierce My Soul’

Winner

Jawaher Korichi, 17, from Columbus, Ohio, responded to an article headlined “Official Death Toll From Hajj Pilgrimage Climbs Into the Hundreds.” She wrote:

As a Muslim, those words pierce my soul, but as a Saharan, I’m not surprised. People don’t appreciate how deadly the desert is. I humbled myself, however, after reading that those hundreds struck down by the heat during Hajj season did not lack knowledge, but funds.

My paternal family never has to worry about affording any religious journey, let alone dying during it. They are comfortable and can stroll between the sacred mountains of Safa and Marwa. They could book a hotel instead of staying in a flimsy tent or lodging area, although the former lacks the modest charm associated with pilgrimage in the first place. Afterward, they can pick up gifts while exiting Saudi. I once received a glimmering blue dress.

My maternal family is different. My mother’s aunt on her first-ever Umrah; a smaller, more accessible religious journey. Facetiming us late one night, she smiled wearily showing us where she slept, an overcrowded room with yellowed walls. My mother warned of the heat; like most pilgrims pictured here, she is more than elderly. It is unlikely she will bring back anything besides her sanctification.

I’m going to Umrah this December. I’m grateful to do so. I’m also grateful for these authors revealing why so many die during Hajj. They bring to light how these people aren’t ignorant, but victims of price-gouging and predatory tourism companies taking advantage of pious people. People like my mother’s aunt.

Runners-Up

In alphabetical order by the writer’s first name.

Adam Liao on “Some Words Feel Truer in Spanish”

Annalise Huang on “Today’s Teenagers Have Invented a Language That Captures the World Perfectly”

Grace Xie on “Whirlwind Romances Are Not Reserved for Thin Women”

Jiachen Cao on “With Each Basket Steph Curry Shoots, I Inch Closer to Death”

Kanishk Dasgupta on “Well Beyond the U.S., Heat and Climate Extremes Are Hitting Billions”

Mara Gualtieri-Horowitz on “Supreme Court Upholds Law Disarming Domestic Abusers”

Oz Susskind on “The Very Online Afterlife of Franz Kafka”

Sabrina Baru Valdez on “How Venice Might Remake Itself as a Contemporary Art Hub”

Yihan Yoon on “How to Talk to Someone With Alzheimer’s”

Ziming Cheng on “A School With 7 Students: Inside the ‘Microschools’ Movement”

Honorable Mentions

Anya Wang on “This Is Peak College Admissions Insanity”

Brianna Liu on “Workers Shouldn’t Have to Risk Their Lives in Heat Waves”

Claire Dong on “A Sock War Is Afoot Between Millennials and Gen Z”

Emma Fennell on “No, I Don’t Want to Protest”

Jason Lu on “Enough With the Fireworks Already”

Julia Weissman on “Surgeon General Declares Gun Violence a Public Health Crisis”

Sophie on “A.I. Is Getting Better Fast. Can You Tell What’s Real Now?”

Yehui Feng on “Our Pandemic Puppy Brought Pure Joy. Losing Him, Pure Heartbreak.”

Yihan Tang on “Surgeon General Calls for Warning Labels on Social Media Platforms"

Yujin Lee on “Today’s Teenagers Have Invented a Language That Captures the World Perfectly”

*篇幅有限,仅展示部分

扫码查看夏季阅读比赛第四周更多获奖论文+导师亮点评析

学生公开信比赛优胜者—Grass Lawns: Lavish and Lamentable

这封信由 Jesuit High School in Portland, Ore  17 岁的露西·罗伯 (Lucy Robb) 撰写,是学习网络学生公开信竞赛的前 9 名获奖者之一,我们收到了 8,065 份参赛作品。

Dear American Lawn Owner,

Imagine this for a moment:

PUT-PUT-PUT! A lawn mower revs its engine and prepares to do its worst. The fuming machine plows over a vast expanse of pristine grass, spewing smog into the air. In front of a white picket fence, green growing turf stretches in great swathes across a front yard.

Perfectly manicured, this lawn has long been the hallmark of the American dream. This dream, however, bears carbon emissions, pesticides, and a lack of diversity. The difficulty of maintaining 40 million acres of lawn across the United States is evident. Annually, 800 million gallons of gas are guzzled solely for lawn mower fuel.

When it comes to front yards, grass is not your only option. Through the many regions of America, native plants grow independently and support their ecosystems. These plants can be incorporated into our own homes as well. Grass lawns should be gradually phased out and replaced with native plants and ground cover.

Some may lump together native plants and weeds, calling this heterogeneous array of botanical life unappealing to the eye. On the contrary, native plants are not all the same as pesky shrubs that spring up when you least expect them. These noninvasive plants and ground covers come in a variety of vibrant hues and sizes. As a yard owner, you can cultivate beauty through unique native plants of your choice.

Native plants have more benefits than simply being pretty to look at. They foster diversity and support ecosystems. The New York Times details how incorporating naturally occurring species of plants into front lawns can foster thriving ecosystems, among other benefits.

By planting native flora, we can pave the way for a more sustainable future. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, 17,532 gallons of water are used by the average household in America each year, just for landscaping irrigation. With native plants, this worry dissipates. Many indigenous plants are able to sustain themselves during dry spells with barely any water.

After this vegetation has been planted, there is little that a homeowner must do for maintenance within their own yard. Native plant lawns only need to be cut twice a year, as opposed to the 25-plus times a year that grass lawns are mowed on average in America. They also thrive in their indigenous habitats, slashing the needs for fertilizers and maintenance.

Beauty and diversity are two intrinsic characteristics of a healthy, happy, and aesthetically-pleasing yard. With the installation of these mini native ecosystems, a bit of botanical life can be incorporated into your daily regime, simultaneously saving you money and helping the Earth.

UnbeLEAFably yours,
Lucy Robb


Works Cited

Briggs, Parker. Native Species Make Your Lawn Truly Green. Inkwell, 6 March 2020.

Cox, Stan. HOAs Often Ban Eco-Friendly Practices as Unaesthetic. Eco-Architecture | Gale in Context: Opposing Viewpoints. Greenhaven Press, 2008.

D’Costa, Krystal. The American Obsession with Lawns. Scientific American, 3 May 2017.

Roach, Margaret. A Viable Alternative to Conventional Lawn? Cornell May Have Found One. New York Times, 13 Sept. 2023.

Trinklein, David. April Showers Bring May Lawn Mowers. University of Missouri Integrated Pest Management, 22 May 2023.

Water-Wise NW Native Plants. Swansons Nursery (website).

学生公开信比赛优胜者—Accepting Autism: A Sibling’s Perspective

这封信由 The Winsor School in Boston 的 16 岁的 Leela Uppaluri 撰写,是 The Learning Network 学生公开信竞赛的前 9 名获奖者之一,我们收到了 8,065 份参赛作品。

Dear Classmates,

You should know that I am not autistic. But growing up just 16 months younger than my autistic brother has given me a front-row seat to how this condition is viewed by many of you. In school, we are surrounded by values of education and inclusion, but these values don’t seem to translate to disability awareness.

Though only four years old, I remember like it was yesterday when my mom told me that my brother is autistic. How she whispered the word “autism” to me, as if she was shielding me from a four-letter word, hoping to protect me from classmates who might later mimic and bully my brother. In 6th grade I remember hearing many of you label autism a “disease.” A disease connotes something wrong with a person, something needing to be fixed. Unfortunately, these constructs outline how we have all grown up thinking about autism.

Fast forward to 9th grade — I have even heard some of you use the “r” slur or the words “moron” or “lame” jokingly. And I’ve also grown up in a world where when you don’t do so well on a math test one of you might joke “are you autistic?” Whenever I hear these insults, I come home angry. Angry because you use an important part of my brother’s identity, who he is, as a put-down. When I’ve told you that you are being ableist, you’ve called me “sensitive.” Though you speak naïvely, you devalue my brother and those like him when you use such language.

The truth is, one in 36 of us is diagnosed with autism. Moreover, people with disabilities are the largest minority group in the United States, and as new disability categories within neurodiversity emerge and grow, so does that percentage. Make no mistake — autism is in all of our classrooms, and we must move toward true acceptance now.

How do we achieve acceptance? Not being ableist is a start. Join a disability advisory group in your school to learn why using language like the “r” slur is not appropriate. Avoid language like “low functioning” that is demeaning and devaluing to some of your peers and learn how to treat and include your autistic peers as you would want to be treated and included. Last, applaud neurodivergence instead of making excuses for it. In other words, the next time you see my brother sway to “Hey Jude” in the aisle of a grocery store or wear headphones to block out sensory overload at California Pizza Kitchen, don’t stare! Just smile. By doing so, you are showing how you accept him and other autistic people for who they are.

Sincerely,
Leela Uppaluri


Works Cited

Data & Statistics on Autism Spectrum Disorder.”Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4 April 2023.

Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. Becoming Disabled. The New York Times, 19 Aug. 2016.

学生公开信比赛优胜者—A Letter to Midjourney

这封信是Seoul Foreign School in Seoul的16岁的贾斯汀·金(Justin Kim)写的,是学习网络学生公开信竞赛的前9名获奖者之一,我们收到了8,065份参赛作品。

Dear Midjourney,

I’m writing this letter to report a crime — one which you’ve committed against me and my fellow artists. Your programs do not create, but merely plunder human creation in order to amalgamate your horrid handiwork.

This is robbery, plain and simple. All artists “take” inspiration, but you seem to have a habit of “taking” entire works and making monsters of them. As artist and illustrator Jackie Ferrentino put it, “A.I. programs scrape human artists’ work to Frankenstein them into a new creation.”

In doing so, your every action disregards artistic convention and robs thousands of their livelihoods. Thus, your current “artistic” practice “devalue[s] the human labor” so inherent to mankind’s God-given gift for creation, as journalists Julia Rothman and Shaina Feinberg aptly described in their 2022 New York Times article.

Of course, this is not to say that your work possesses no potential value. Jason M. Allen of Pueblo West, Colo., claimed that “Art is dead,” and that “humans lost.” His Midjourney-sourced work is certainly impressive: your “Théâtre D’opéra Spatial” won Mr. Allen an award at the Colorado State Fair in 2022. Arguments have been made in favor of your creative use.

We all know that art is more than just paint on a canvas. In the early days of photography, then too did artists predict creative expression would perish. Perhaps you are also merely a new medium for artistic creation. But if so, you must be bound by the same code as us. Therefore, we artists declare: if you are here to stay, you will be leashed.

Regulatory action remains in flux, but good people in good governments are already making progress. The European Union has successfully passed the world’s first major act to regulate A.I. Across the sea, the United States Congress is already debating the feasibility of an “A.I. Bill of Rights.”

The E.U.’s resolution demands a clear definition for A.I., dividing your functions into categories of risk. It does not, at least yet, stipulate that you cite your sources like the rest of us. I acknowledge that may be impossible, given the sheer number of works you steal from to assemble your handiwork, but that does not mean you will be allowed to purloin unabated. Even now, laws are being written that will require you to yield your stolen source material.

Certainly, your work improves by the day. You have grown uncannily good at imitating man. Some would argue you could even replace man. But that just means you must be subject to the same laws as the rest of us. So like any other, you have the right to remain silent. Like any other, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.

I wish you well in your trial,
Justin


Works Cited

Blueprint for an A.I. Bill of Rights: Making Automated Systems Work For the American People. Whitehouse.gov

E.U. A.I Act: First Regulation on Artificial Intelligence. European Parliament (Website). Updated 18 June 2024.

Kang, Cecilia and Satariano, Adam. Five Ways A.I. Could Be Regulated. The New York Times, 6 Dec. 2023.

Roose, Kevin. An A.I.-Generated Picture Won an Art Prize. Artists Aren’t Happy. The New York Times, 2 Sept. 2022.

Rothman, Julia and Feinberg, Shaina. Human Artists Take on Their New Robot Competition. The New York Times, 23 Dec. 2022.

学生公开信比赛优胜者—Reclaiming Singapore’s Credit for Success: Removing Colonialist Statues

这封信的作者是Choate Rosemary Hall in Wallingford, Conn.的 15 岁的艾玛·王 (Emma Wang),她是学习网络学生公开信竞赛的前 9 名获奖者之一,我们收到了 8,065 份参赛作品。

Dear Singapore Government,

My memories of Singapore make me who I am, a proud citizen of a beautiful country. However, there is one part of Singapore’s past that no citizen is proud of: colonialism. So, I am asking you to take down the statue of Sir Stamford Raffles.

With the second highest G.D.P. per capita in the world, Singapore’s robust economy is often used to justify its colonial past. The misguided notion that British imperialists brought “Western know-how” to build our prosperous society is problematic, as it glorifies colonization and a false notion of Western superiority.

In 1963, when Singapore gained its independence, “nearly 70 percent of the population lived in slums,” according to SG101, a government website that tells the story of Singapore’s journey as a nation. Britain left us with almost no local industry, while unemployment rates hovered in the double digits. The stark contrast of this despair with Singapore’s current success is not a result of British imperialism — it is an astonishing rebound from it.

Located south of the Straits of Malacca, Singapore’s natural deep-sea ports place it at the crossroads between two important shipping channels. Now, with more than 5,000 maritime companies and over 130 international shipping groups, Singapore’s ports are among the busiest in the world. These ports were able to sustain Singapore’s economy in a fundamental way after independence, and before colonization; Britain simply saw this potential and exploited it to its advantage.

Singapore also created a decolonization plan with impressive urgency and effectiveness. As SG101 describes, “While some newly independent nations with large domestic markets were adopting protectionist policies — ejecting foreign companies, slashing imports, and manufacturing their own products for the domestic market — Singapore had to go against the grain and open our borders to foreign investors.” This unique, and brave, policy allowed Singapore to become economically self-reliant. Clearly, Singapore’s economic success is not simply a continuation of British ideologies, but rather the country’s strategy for decolonization and economic independence.

Colonial influence will always be our past, but do we need to celebrate it in the present? The statue of Sir Stamford Raffles encourages problematic justifications of colonialism, obscuring Singapore’s success. The original statue stands in front of Empress Place, with a plaque that reads “This tablet to the memory of Sir Stamford Raffles, to whose foresight and genius Singapore owes its existence and prosperity ….” Owes? The statue misleadingly attributes Singapore’s hard-won prosperity to him, “the founder,” and British imperialism.

As The New York Times reported, many statues in the U.S. are being removed, including those of former slave owners, racists, and violent conquistadors. Singapore should follow this example. We, as a country, need to give ourselves credit for our astonishingly successful decolonization efforts, instead of undermining those triumphs, diminishing our resilience with a towering figure of our conquistador.

With respect,
Emma


Works Cited

Crabtree, James. Five Chart History of Post-Colonial Asia. Financial Times. Last modified 29 Aug. 2014.

Gaumont British Instructional. Singapore, A Study of A Port. Directed by Brian Salt. 1954.

Mindur, Maciej. Significance of the Port of Singapore Against the Country’s Economic Growth. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport 106 (2020): 107-121.

The New York Times. How Statues Are Falling Around the World. 24 June 2020.

1959-1965: Early Economic Strategies. SG101.

Rodrigue, Jean-Paul. Maritime Shipping Routes and Strategic Locations. Map. Port Economics Management.

Statue of Stamford Raffles. National Library Board.

Teck-Wong Soon, and William A. Stoever. Foreign Investment and Economic Development in Singapore: A Policy-Oriented Approach. The Journal of Developing Areas 30, no. 3 (1996): 317–40.

Vasagar, Jeevan. Can Colonialism Have Benefits? Look at Singapore. The Guardian. Last modified 4 Jan. 2018.

White, Nicholas J. The Settlement of Decolonization and Post-Colonial Economic Development: Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore Compared. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde 173, no. ⅔ (2017): 208–41.